User talk:LinguisticDemographer

Welcome!

Hello, LinguisticDemographer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- DiegoTehMexican 00:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Categories

I read the help page on categories, and it seemed to imply that if a currently non-existent category name is appended to an article in the normal way, then the category gets created. I tried this in several articles with the as-yet un-listed "cement", and it doesn't work. What am I doing wrong?LinguisticDemographer 20:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article will get added to the category, but the category will still look like a red-link. To make it a blue link, just add something to the category page (it will go above the "pages in this cat" part). -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 20:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Map Coordinates

In geographical-based articles, I need to use the Coordinate function, e.g. {{coor title dm|51|42|N|4|57|W|region:GB_type:city}} to improve the value of the article. I can't find any Help on the syntax of this feature. What are the functions of its components? What are the options available? Can you help?

It's a template; you can find the template itself at {{coor title dm}} and its documentation at Template talk:coor title dm. --ais523 16:55, 6 November 2006 (U T C)

Little England

Thanks for adding the references to Little England beyond Wales (and I've just noticed that Landsker Line has grown considerably, too, and we have an Eglwyswrw, and all sorts). I see that all three references are actually in my local library and so perhaps I should go and look myself. But given your name, you may know off-hand: would you be able to comment on the mention of English-speaking patches in the Vale of Glamorgan? Is this a continuation of the same line, or something different, or...?

Looking at your user page, you may also be interested in the Welsh Wikipedians' notice board (shortcut: WP:WWNB).

Telsa (talk) 07:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ye gods, that was fast! Thanks a lot for so much info. Telsa (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Edits

How do I make a draft of a major re-write of an article available for inspection by other editors before over-writing the existing article? LinguisticDemographer 17:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are various ways to approach this. Firstly you can propose your changes on the talk page of the article first, get input from other editors then apply your changes directly. We're a Wiki, your changes can always be rolled back by anyone using the history tab. Be bold is sometimes quoted in these things, though also "but don't be reckless" is a part to that, if you think your changes are going to be controversial discussion upfront is always good. Another alternative is to take a copy into a subpage of your user space such as User:LinguisticDemographer/Draft and work on it there, copying back when finished, some editors do this but generally the editing the real page method is preferable. --pgk 18:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LaugharneBoathouse.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:LaugharneBoathouse.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Pembrokeshire Maps

Sorry about that. Graphics are more my thing than geography, and my graphics are pretty poor. I've only done a couple of them so far specifically so I can get feedback like this (it's a pretty major problem!). Anyway it's very simple to fix as the files are vector graphics, you can either edit them yourself using a program like Inkscape or copy one of the files into something like Paint and draw on it where they should be, then upload it to somewhere like Imageshack and post the link on my talkpage. I'll then fix them asap. Alexj2002 18:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively: I've had a quick search on Google, could you tell me if the positions are correct in this map [1]? If so I'll move my dots to the locations in this image. Alexj2002 18:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you have a look at the modified Haverfordwest map and let me know if it looks correct now. Thanks, Alexj2002 20:35, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

In THIS ARTICLE, how do I center-justify the cell contents? LinguisticDemographer 02:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By adding <center> at the start and </center> at the end. I alread fixed it for you. Let me know if there is anything else. Cheers — WilsBadKarma ^(Talk) 02:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think he was looking more at the cell contents, rather than the whole table. Apologies if not. If so:

This is how I usually set up tables -- it's not pretty, at first, but when your tables get large and complicated, it can be a little easier to read. The 'align="center"' affects all cells in the row; the 'align="left"' affects only the specific cell it precedes (easier example, you can have the whole table with a red background, and set just one cell to be different).

|- align="center"
|align="left" | General purpose
|65
|15
|8
|9

If you still like to have it all on one row:

|- align="center"
|align="left" | Low heat || 25 || 55 || 3 || 14

You don't actually need the 'align="left"', but I thought you might want it there. If you get rid of that, you'll also need to remove the pipe that seperates it from the cell. Hope that helps! – Luna Santin (talk) 02:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:LaugharneBoathouse.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:LaugharneBoathouse.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 19:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undo redirect

Rotary kiln currently redirects to Rotary drier. As pointed out in the latter's discussion, this is completely unrelated. How does one undo this redirect, so that a needed Rotary kiln article can be created? LinguisticDemographer 00:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to the Rotary kiln page, when the redirected page comes up just below the title is text like "(Redirected from Rotary kiln)", where "Rotary kiln" is a link. Click that link and you'll go back to the real page avoiding the redirect. --pgk 00:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Leblanc process

Out of curiosity, what process replaced Leblanc for potassium carbonate production? I assume it was an electrolytic one. Also, do you have a reference for Leblanc being used until the 1960's for potassium? If so, please post it in the article. Thanks. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 17:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:KilgerranHundred.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:LDKilgerranHundred.png. The copy called Image:LDKilgerranHundred.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move title plus links

Due to a disambiguation, I need to rename an article which, due to an automated linking process has (I think) several thousand links pointing to it. Is there an automatic way to also rename the links?{{helpme}}. . . . LinguisticDemographer 19:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If you click the move button at the top of the page, you can move the page, and a redirect to the new page name will be created at the old name. None of the links will end up broken, so don't worry about it :-) Stwalkerster talk 20:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, but there's a problem: the likely new name isn't pretty. The article is "Urban district" which needs to be "Urban district (British local government)" or some such. So the typical link to it would need to be [[Urban district (British local government)|Urban district]], or else thousands of angry editors will be at work for weeks. Is this still possible?{{helpme}}

Hi! When you move the page, it will be from Urban district to Urban district (British local government), and create a redirect pointing all users going to Urban district to Urban district (British local government). Therefore, if someone was to click a link to Urban district, they would in fact find themselves at Urban district (British local government). I hope this clears things up a bit. :-) Stwalkerster talk 20:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Edits

{{helpme}}

In an article that I watch, thinly-disguised commercial and advertising text has started to appear on the Talk page. Obviously such material in the Main Article gets deleted immediately, but what is the policy regarding deletion of other people's talk-page entries?. . . .LinguisticDemographer 15:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, the relevant guidelines are at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, but I'm not sure that the situation comes up often enough to be in the guidelines ("[guidelines are] not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception", from {{guideline}}, and this seems to be one of the cases where the guideline isn't clear). Generally speaking, you shouldn't remove other people's comments without a good reason; some examples of good reasons are shown in the guideline itself, and this might very well be another one which doesn't come up often enough to have been codified. If the text is purely advertising, you can probably delete it linking to WP:CSD#G11 as the reason (blatant advertising is deleted no matter which namespace it's in). It's best to replace the comment with a note explaining what you've done rather than removing it altogether; it's important to not try to misrepresent what's happened. Hope that helps! --ais523 16:25, 10 September 2007 (U T C)

(Phooey on edit conflicts) The full policy on that can be found at WP:TALK, but the policy does specifically state that it is acceptable to edit other's comments to remove prohibited material or material not relevant to improving the article. Just make sure you leave a very specific edit summary as to why you're removing the comment, and be ready to deal with questions. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PC History

Thank you very much for your copy editing on the History of Plaid Cymru page!! It is always good to have various eyes on a topic!Drachenfyre 08:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little England

I saw your note. Won't have time to respond in detail yet. Just got book from library on the subject. Recommend to keep further discussion to article talkpage. Agathoclea 13:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Castlemartin

Are you planning to move the article? Agathoclea 17:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tynged yr iaith

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Tynged yr iaith, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Phgao 00:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I enjoyed the artical very much! Im glad it stays! Would providing the complete text be beyond the scope of the artical?Drachenfyre 00:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And on Did You Know, too! Nice article. Telsa (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your facts

Hello: WP is about verifiable facts. Myron Evans has no academic post in the UK as you can verify on the list of UK universities that I provided and have restored to this BLP. You can check this for yourself as others have done long before now. If you have not, then you are being lazy. Please therefore refrain from statements about libel. If you believe that Evans is a wronged scientist, you will have to argue your case on WP:FRINGE which is where pseudoscientific matters are discussed on WP.--Mathsci 01:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Tynged yr iaith, was selected for DYK!

On October 10, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tynged yr iaith, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of National Merit
		Thanks for sorting out the (admittedly understandable) pro-Welsh slant on Treachery of the Blue Books. Your edits don't go unnoticed, and it's nice to see that there are people willing to put aside any opinions they might have and argue both sides. Well done. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 22:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds

You might be interested in this discussion. - Agathoclea (talk) 14:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg

Hello! Might you be interested in assisting me updating this page to be unbiased? Drachenfyre (talk) 07:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cynllibiwg again

I've proposed merging whatever is valid from the Cynllibiwg page into Rhwng Gwy a Hafren. I'd almost forgotten about the shadowy "kingdom" but it seems to have its supporters. Maybe you'd care to contribute should there be a debate? Cofion, Enaidmawr (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Maps

Hello again. You made some comment on the Welsh history page when I complained that the historical maps of Wales were a complete nonsense. Would you allow me to send you some maps of Britain/Wales which are far superior and more accurate in order that they may be considered for inclusion instead.

Kind regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.232.195 (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh Maps Ceredigion

Hi. Wondering if you have access to a map that could be used for Creuddyn (Ceredigion)? Thanks. ~Geaugagrrl^talk 08:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:CemKilnKiln.jpg

File:CemKilnKiln.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CemKilnKiln.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:CemKilnKiln.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KilnBZ.JPG is now available as Commons:File:KilnBZ.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CemKilnSP4.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CemKilnSP4.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LDCementXRDOnline.JPG is now available as Commons:File:LDCementXRDOnline.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LDCement2StringPH.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LDCement2StringPH.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:50, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LDClinkerScaled.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LDClinkerScaled.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JK Organisation

The article JK Organisation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited, and no significant coverage in independent sources found on searching.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Little England beyond Wales

I don't suppose I can convince you to come back to help with a rewrite of Little England beyond Wales? I don't think it will need a huge amount of work, but a subject that interesting deserves a great article, and your work there shows you are certainly knowledgeable.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:11, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JK Lakshmi Cement

The article JK Lakshmi Cement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like an advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laber□^T 14:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rural District maps

Can you help? I see you produced the maps for Llanfyrnach Rural District and St Dogmells Rural District. What we need, for Cemaes Rural District, is a combination of the two but I have no idea how to go about it. Can you help? Tony Holkham (Talk) 11:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]