User talk:Lindiwenkabinde
Welcome!
|
March 2017
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC) |
Reason for Unblock
[edit]Lindiwenkabinde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason for the request to be unblocked because I created the page Lasizwe Dambuza because he genuinely deserved to be on Wikipedia, The suspension of being a sock puppetry to Lindokhule Modi I don't even know this person. I can not be accused on allegations I am not aware of and ones that I didn't commit. Lindiwenkabinde (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't believe you created this account for this reason. I believe you created it because of your conflict of interest. While this doesn't directly go to the accusations of sockpuppetry, it does indicate you are being disingenuous with your unblock request. The fact that you claim here to be Thulasizwe Dambuza ("own work", author; note despite your claim, I don't believe you are Thulasizwe Dambuza), furthers my suspicion you have a conflict of interest, here. Yamla (talk) 12:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.