User talk:Linagober
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Linagober, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Eman235/talk 20:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Robert Pattinson
[edit]Hello, I have removed your [edit] at Robert Pattinson's article becuase as per Wikipedia policies WP:Crystal and WP:NFF state clearly that films which are just announced and not have begin their principal photography should not be added in the filmography section of the said actor/actress article nor it should merit its own article. i urge you to please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. If you have any queries regarding it, please feel free to leave me a message at my talk page. Regards--Jockzain (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
July 2019
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Robert Pattinson. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 02:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)November 2019
[edit]Your recent editing history at Robert Pattinson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. You are going down a bad path. Due to your history of refusing to follow our policies, the next block will be indefinite...you will be completely prohibited from editing wikipedia not just for a few days/week or so. DMacks (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Important notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Robert Pattinson; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 08:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
[edit]Your recent editing history at Robert Pattinson shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tenet (film). Cognissonance (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 15:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Pattinson. DMacks (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 04:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)- In addition to multiple other disruptive patterns, including EW and BLP violations, with this edit you performed the same change that led to multiple previous blocks for disruption. You have never bothered to address others' concerns via discussion. Your potentially constructive edits are overwhelmed by the amount of time others have to spend reading and rejecting many of your other edits. DMacks (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vdh m, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.