User talk:Limongi/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Rio 2016

Hi Limongi. I respectfully request that you provide opinion on why you think concerns re: crime in Rio are not pertinent to the article when other Olympic Games' cities' pages have similar concerns, e.g. human rights in China on the Beijing 2008 games page. Thank you. For your convenience, I have posted a request for consensus here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2016_Summer_Olympics. I think it would be wise to state that the city has crime, back it up with the sources which I put in the article, and then counter-point that with observations that the IOC have said that they think the city is safe. If we combined both in one paragraph or two, think we could keep in it? Thank you.67.182.141.118 (talk) 05:23, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

UPDATE: Hi Limongi. Thank you for being flexible and fair. I, too, find it important that both sides of the story should be respected. Here is a proposed paragraph for a section for your consideration:

(new section: Security Concerns)

Since the award of the 2016 Olympics to Rio de Janeiro, the city's crime problems have gotten more attention. A police helicopter was shot down over a favela during one of many of the city's drug wars . Rio's mayor has admitted that there are "big issues" facing the city in securing the games from violence, however, he also states that such concerns and issues were presented to the IOC throughout the bidding process . Indeed, the city has one of the highest murder rates in the world, with 2,273 murders in 2006 .

The IOC, however, has expressed optimism with allowing the city and the nation of Brazil to address these concerns. Seven years is enough time for Rio de Janeiro to clean up its crime problem the IOC says. IOC spokesman Mark Adams told The Associated Press "we have confidence in their capacity to deliver a safe Games in seven years." "Security is of course a very important aspect of any Olympic Games no matter where it is in the world. This is of course entirely under the national, regional and city authorities." , , Finally, Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has noted that the city has hosted other high-profile events without major incident, for example the 2007 Pan American Games.

What do you think? Feel free to edit as you see fit directly in the paragraphs above.  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.141.118 (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Alberto Sabino

Hello Felipe. Would you mind to look at this, please? The article was deleted and recreated again. I've added {{prod}}, since the sources are insufficient in my opinion. However, I can't speak Portuguese and it seems, that Sabino could be somewhat notable in Brazil. Thanks for your time, have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks many times Felipe, good work! Many greetings to the sunny Rio and good luck with the 2014 World Cup - especially the Spanish team is very young and excellent, it would be a hard nut to crack even for Brazilian canaries:) Antonín Vejvančický (talk) 06:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Request

Replies at the talk pages. Felipe Menegaz 03:17, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: I was happy to see that I left a legacy. Felipe Menegaz 03:17, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Limongi, I am trying to include Brazil and India in the article Great power due to recent events and the attention that the international press is giving to these countries as emerging powers. Could you express your opinion in the Talk Page? Felipe Menegaz 03:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

That is not easy... See: [1] [2] [3] [4] Felipe Menegaz 01:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I know. I really don't understand why it is so difficult for people to accept that Brazil has emerged as a global power. All the sources clearly state that. I lived in the U.S. for a year... I was amazed to see that the majority of Americans (at least the one's I've met, including teachers) had absolutely no clue whatsoever about Brazil. They thought I spoke Spanish, that the capital of Brazil was Buenos Aires, and asked me if I "lived in the jungle", if there were "monkeys on the streets", etc. I would understand them if this happened 20 years ago, but today with the internet?!?!?! Unfortunately the same type of ignorant (lit.) people are here on Wikipedia, and from what I've learned in life, it is extremely difficult to change the views of narrow-minded people - they simply don't want to accept the facts.Limongi (talk) 01:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Have you a Messenger? Felipe Menegaz 01:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

felipelimongi@live.com

Added. Felipe Menegaz 02:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Clara Nunes.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Clara Nunes.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 01:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Limongi ^(talk) 22:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Banco do Brasil logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Banco do Brasil logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

argentina-brazil

Hi, would be nice to have some backward photo too, specifically one of Alfonsin and Sarney together ( like this one [5] but not sure about licenses ) as they are the Founding Fathers of integration and later mercosur in early 80s --Jor70 (talk) 14:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Citation box

Template:Citation box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 21:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Union of South American Nations

Hi Limongi:

I noted you undo all my contributions to the UNASUR article. May I ask why? Thank you.

Brazilian Diplomatic Missions

Hello, According to the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs website, there is no mention whatsoever to these Vice-Consulates. The link is here Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Regards, Aquintero (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Pedro II signature

Hello there! Tell me something, if I upload a better version of Pedro II signature, could you improve it as you did to the one that it is in the article now? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Here it is! --Lecen (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. For some reason it looks blurry on the infobox. Limongi ^(talk) 17:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

If not asking too much, but, are you capable of making the background of these images turn into white?[6][7] Not translucid, just white. Are you capable of doing the same with this and this and also, if possible, improve their quality? Thanks! --Lecen (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Brazil

Hello, Limongi! Good morning! The article Brazil is blocked due to a dispute over a content. I would like to know if you would be interested in giving your opinion to end it once and for all. In case you do not know much about the subject, I could explain it better to you. This is the link. All help is needed. Thank your very much and kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:46, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Brazil United States Relations

Just because you, Limongi, represent the Brazilian dictatorial government does not mean that you control what relations are between the US and Brazil. The US media and leading government officials (i.e., Hillary Clinton, President Obama) have discussed this issue repeatedly in recent weeks in regards to Bazzil, and Congressman Crhis Smith is discussing trade measures against Brazil in conjunction with this issue, so to my mind and that of many other Americans, this is a very relevant issue You can keep editing this all that you want, and I will keep changing it back, because I am enjoying this. Myk6064024.148.73.133 (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Policia federal logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Policia federal logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

=RE:IDH Brasília

Atá, foi mal. Affleck (talk) 22:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

G1.com

A tag has been placed on G1.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 05:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your behavaiour is very negative. A couple of users agreed to make a change, and you are reverting those changes without even discussing, please stop this. ValenShephard (talk) 02:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Regardless of your correctness in the dispute, please don't use the rollback tool for anything but clear-cut vandalism. Content disputes are not vandalism. Also, just in case you're unaware, I'm going to remind you of WP:3RR, which says if you make more than 3 reversions in 24 hours other than for blatant vandalism, there's an automatic block rule. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

No need to remind me of the 3RR. I'm well aware of it. Thank you. Limongi (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

UNASUR

As I wrote on my talk, no hard feelings. A misunderstanding, particularly easy in internetland. ValenShephard (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brazilian Government logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brazilian Government logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

List of diplomatic missions of Brazil

Hello, There is absolutely no proof that Brazil has missions in any of these countries nor do you have references in the 'talk page' as you claim. Please verify with the website of the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs before making changes and claiming that Brazil has said missions. Thanks you. Aquintero (talk) 08:26, 05 September 2010, (UTC)

The reference says that the Brazilian government "will open" these missions later in the year. Our policy to list missions once they have been opened, not ones that are "waiting" to be opened. Aquintero (talk) 08:37, 05 September 2010, (UTC)

Dilma Rousseff

Hello, Limongi. Long time no see, huh? In the 1960s, the COLINA has has a goal - as all the other communist organisations supported by Cuba, USSR and China - the creation of communist dictatorships. The article about Dilma has a reliable source and I would like to request you to not remove sourced content. Lastly, the fact that she once wanted to create a dictatorship does not mean that she wants to that today. Thank you, --Lecen (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)