Jump to content

User talk:Limelife editor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Christy Turlington do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Reply

[edit]

You do not mention a single fact related to how or why the external links added to the page Christy Turlington do not meet guidelines for external links. We entered those links to append very relevant and persistent information regarding Christy. How does that violate the guidelines and furthermore represent link spam? They are not links to advertisements, but specific fact based content completely in line with guidelines and furthermore benefit the reader/researcher. Provide specifics or please cease.

Sockpuppetry case

[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mpmccart for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This accusation is baseless. we are a legitimate web and mobile publisher and this wiki represents our vision and mission. Please remove the accusation asap.LimeLifeLimelife editor (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia, because it appears to be mainly intended or used for promotional purposes of a company or group. See Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

In addition, accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing, and your username should reflect this.

Wikipedia is not a promotion website; this kind of activity is considered spam on Wikipedia, and forbidden by policies, and usernames that appear to be promotional also violate our username policy. Editing on Wikipedia is not intended to be used to promote anyone, or anything, and its use for that purpose will result in blocking of the account involved.

If you feel that there has been a mistake, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or contacting the administrator who has blocked you. Your reason should include a clear response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy. Please check that your new username has not already been taken here. Blueboy96 20:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Limelife editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a fact based informational wiki that does not represent any corpoarte promotional or advertising specific messaging. Once again, not one credible example or exhibit of a violation has been provided. If the accusing editor would provide that I will take corrective action immediately. If that can't be provided, it proves this is a baseless accusation and the block should be lifted asap

Decline reason:

No valid unblock reason given. Wikipedia isn't a court of law. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Limelife editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request that I be unblocked and will submit nay of my edits/changes/updates for review prior to saving. This should satisfy any concerns that I am a Spammer or represent any particular company's self promotion. Good enough?

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Domain-tracking

--A. B. (talk • contribs) 01:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Limelife_editor&oldid=1143135495"