User talk:LimWRtacCHsua

It is suspected that this user may be a sock puppet or impersonator of Panairjdde.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde for evidence. See block log

Notes for the suspect

Notes for the accuser

Based on your answers at the above page, I have determined you are blocked used Panairjdde, & have blocked this account also. -- llywrch 19:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LimWRtacCHsua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

silly deduction

Decline reason:

see below

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

this edit of yours says it all --pgk^(talk) 22:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it, could you explain better?--LimWRtacCHsua 22:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked editor: your unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request. seems pretty clear to me, do not replace the unblock tag. I guess I read the context of that particular comment incorrectly with it being interpretable in a couple of conflicting ways, the overall converstation with you as the blocked user insisting the account is "closed". which as noted several times is not possible there is no such thing as a closed account is a clear trait of the blocked user --pgk^(talk) 06:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not saying my account is closed. User:Panairjdde wrote (final post) that he changed his password to a random one, and can't login anymore, so his account is closed.
I won't re-add an unblock tag to this page, but you motivated the unblock rejection with a link ("this edit of yours says it all") that you admitted you misinterpreted. So, would you reconsider unblocking me?

--LimWRtacCHsua 18:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]