User talk:Lily kitty15
Welcome
[edit]
|
Speedy deletion of Kyaa Hoga Nimmo Kaa
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Kyaa Hoga Nimmo Kaa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Goochelaar (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Lily Kitty - as you were previously advised, you copy-and-pasted material from the official website into the article Kyaa Hoga Nimmo Kaa. This is not permitted per our copyright policy, since the website's creators own the rights to that text. It has now been removed. In the future please don't copy text from other websites. Thanks. Dcoetzee 01:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jaane Pehchaane Se Ye Ajnabbi
[edit]A tag has been placed on Jaane Pehchaane Se Ye Ajnabbi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Basket of Puppies 05:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright block
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)- While it is good that you "removed the context that was copyright" from Amar Upadhyay after a bot detected the pasting in your new article on January 10th, you cannot continue pasting content onto Wikipedia from other sources. Please review our policies on this very carefully. Additional copying may lead to an extended block. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Lily kitty15! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Sidharth Shukla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Amarjeet Shukla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Akashdeep Saighal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Repost of Kritika Kamra2
[edit] A tag has been placed on Kritika Kamra2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Sidharth Shukla for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidharth Shukla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddharth Shukla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 22:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)