User talk:Lilmixsta

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:PokemonopeningUS10.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:PokemonopeningUS10.jpg and also as Image:PokemonopeningUS10.JPG. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ppgzenxv3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ppgzenxv3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Serebii.net

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Serebii.net, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Serebii.net is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Serebii.net, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Song articles

Hi there,

I noticed you've been creating articles for songs from the Ojamajo Doremi series. Unfortunately there are two problems with them: Firstly, although the notability guideline for songs is still only in its proposal stages (see Wikipedia:Notability (songs)), discussions there and on deletion pages for song articles generally concur that the song needs to have some non-trivial coverage outside its origins (e.g. critical commentary, awards, being the first song in a new genre, etc.) and the articles you have created don't seem to meet that. Secondly, lyrics. As Wikipedia:Copyrights points out, any creation is automatically copyrighted and it requires its creator to specifically license or release the rights to it for it be freely usable. Song lyrics are one such creation, and as copyrighted works we definitely cannot use them in an article. Sorry. Confusing Manifestation 00:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joichi's Mr. Wonderful

The article Joichi's Mr. Wonderful has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 19:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Votre Homme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page you created, you may want to consult WP:Your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BillCJ (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WE CAN DO ANYTHING

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article WE CAN DO ANYTHING, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of WE CAN DO ANYTHING. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]