User talk:Lillypad2

Welcome!

Hello, Lillypad2, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Your first article
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

—Dismas|^(talk) 06:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Lynch

Regarding this edit that you made to the Kelly Lynch article, please see WP:REDLINK. Basically, red links aren't a bad thing. They show where articles might be needed. And when that article is added, then an editor doesn't have to go around to every actor's bio and make links to that article. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 06:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

When you're editing articles about living people, per WP:BLP, you must provide reliable sources to support your edits. Where are the sources which prove that Mark Ballas and Derek Hough are "best friends"? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The way *I* read the tvguide.com link, it's saying that his sister Cheryl is his BFF. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

90210

Hello, I think your edit to the characters section on 90210 is good. However, I reverted your edits as you removed all sources given. If you make the edits again please don't take away the sources and I'll leave it alone. Jayy008 (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because that's what Wikipedia is. Everything has to be referenced. Please add the refs back, I don't want to revert your edits again because they're very good. Jayy008 (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the only thing that has to be referenced is is the regular characters that left. It's not my rules, everything on Wikipedia has to be verified.

As for the other thing, I didn't put the episode counts so before acusing people of things, please check out the history of the page to see who has made the edit. You're not supposed to just remove information, if you think they're not recurring move it somewhere else. You removed 2 characters, a special guest a recurring character. Javier and Teddy's Dad. Please Add these back under different sections or you will be blocked from editing.

All that it needs is a source to say that Jessica Walter left and Dustin Milligan. You can either go back through the history and puts the ones back from before or google "Jessica Walter leaves 90210" and choose anyone. It's as simple as that. Jayy008 (talk) 11:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because my name is there, doesn't mean I made that particular edit, I edited that box yes, but I didn't do that. Also I never said anything about reccurring not being 6 episodes, what I said was everything has to be sourced, I did it now anyway. Jayy008 (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Fringe (season 3), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. --ANowlin: talk 23:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jon & Kate Plus 8

Please read WP:REPEATLINK, exception #1, and stop removing the name wikilinks from the Family section of Jon & Kate Plus 8. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Fringe (season 3). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. --ANowlin: talk 23:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jon & Kate Plus 8, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jon & Kate Plus 8. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jon & Kate Plus 8, you may be blocked from editing. --Geniac (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jon & Kate Plus 8, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Geniac (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been explained to you many times. Repeated wikilinks are not forbidden. Stop removing them or you will be blocked. --Geniac (talk) 00:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smallville (season 10)

If you see your work repeatedly removed, it might be recommended that you read the talk page for that page. The reason your "New and Returning Characters" edits have been removed (twice) is because the current consensus, however briefly discussed, is that two names doesn't really merit a section, especially for a final season where more names and information will continue to become available in the two months it will take to premeire. I won't be joining the removal team, but thought you deserved to know the rationale in case it should happen again. KnownAlias contact 13:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The two names you are adding are already on the page. There is no need to move them to their own section at this particular time because all we know is that they are going to appear. When we created the original "New and returning characters" section in season 9 it was because we had quite a bit of info on the new and returning characters. Right now we don't even know who the new baddie will officially be for the show. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TH43 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Redfarmer (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Geniac (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.