User talk:Lilkim.xl

Warning

You are edit-warring at Lil' Kim and adding uncited personal-life claims in violation of WP:BLP, one of Wikipedia's core policies. As per WP:BRD, when first reverted you were to take your issue to the article's talk page. If you continue to edit-war, an admin will be notified who may block you from editing. Please discuss your issue on the talk page.--Tenebrae (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 11, 1976 is literally her real birthdate Lilkim.xl (talk) 06:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to VH1, Fuse, The Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Icons of Hip Hop: An Encyclopedia of the Movement, Music, and Culture, Volume 2, Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll, Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television or This Day in Music: An Every Day Record of Musical Feats and Facts.--Tenebrae (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

This is the required warning that you are about to break WP:3RR if you edit-war again at Lil' Kim. That is a bright-line violation and an admin will block you. --Tenebrae (talk)

3RR

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Tenebrae (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 9 (Lil' Kim album) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:23, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkim.xl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1Hello admin members, I was notify earlier that I was blocked for trying to simply correct the inaccurate age of my favorite artist Lil' Kim, it was a misunderstanding someone took it out of context because I kept repeatly trying to correct the page but some how someone tried to blame me for an edit war that I had no idea of. I am trying to make Wikipedia a good source for everyone to read and study on while eating on their donuts & drinking coffee while scrolling down on the pages. Thank you! I would like to be unblocked or put me on an exspiration date whatever is fine I just would love to help edit some pages that's all, all love over here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 05:12, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkim.xl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware of the things that I was blocked for, I would of been satisfied if the individual that blocked me listed down the multiple accounts that I apparently abused. I would love for Wikipedia to correct my favorite artist Lil’ Kim real age on her Wikipedia page, that was the main point on why I got blocked in the first place for engaging in a edit war. I admit I was being childish with the edit war but all I was trying to do was organize the page and put real, accurate information on the page that the edit war took place. Whoever is reviewing this thank you for taking the time to acknowledge this situation, it was all my fault I hope all the administrators on the platform would under it and actually hear me out. Lilkim.xl (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This has already been provided to you. We know you abused the account, Kimerie; see Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Lilkim.xl. As you have not addressed this and are instead wasting your time with this request talking about Lil' Kim's real age, I'm declining this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment

@Lilkim.xl: And I would add that according to according to VH1, to Fuse, to The Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits, to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, to the Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll, to Encyclopedia of African American Actresses in Film and Television and to other such books, encyclopedias and government websites all footnoted at the article, the 1976 date is not her real birthdate. You have provided no required citations for where you get this date. You are telling Wikipedia not to believe all these encyclopedias, government sites, etc., since you, personally, know better than them. That is not how Wikipedia or, in fact, any research anywhere works. Can you at least understand that part? --Tenebrae (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologie

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkim.xl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mistakes I’m apologizing to the administrators on Wikipedia for my terrible actions, I did abused the other page kimerie as a sock puppet when I should of never logged into the account. If I ever get unblocked I will will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead of causing harm.

Decline reason:

I don't see a reason to unblock at this time. I would suggest you consider our standard offer, and consider an appeal in 6 months. Note that this is not guaranteed, but if you have not socked an administrator may consider unblocking you then. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lilkim.xl (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkim.xl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello may I please be unblocked again it’s been a month & I miss helping the platform out. Hope all is well (:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lilkim.xl (talk) 06:40, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I very strongly suggest you take down this pointless unblock request. If you are just going to waste our time with requests like this, you'll find you will lose access to this talk page. WP:GAB explains how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LILKIMQUEENBEE.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LILKIMQUEENBEE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lilkim.xl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello administrators of Wikipedia I was informed that I would be un suspended in the month of November, If I ever make a return to the platform I would like to correct some inaccurate articles. I’m taking full ownership & accountability that I orchestrated back in June of this yearLilkim.xl (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appears to be a blatant lie. Or you are so incompetent that you cannot determine six months after 2019-06-29 is 2019-12-29. Either way, there are no grounds to lift the block. You are welcome to try again no sooner than 2020-05-13, under the terms of WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 12:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Lilkim.xl (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]