User talk:Lile
Avoid restating the subject of the article or of an enclosing section in heading titles. 71.132.131.237 01:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow, now it looks like any other Wikipedia article. Boring! More photo uploads, please! 71.132.131.237 02:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
So, where are Hopkins' uploads? 71.132.131.237 06:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Anyone who removes [1] and [2] from Art.Net should be at least partially reverted, because those were specifically requested. 71.132.138.237 14:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Art.net links
[edit]As you are the webmaster of this site, it would be appropriate to wait for other editors to provide links to the article on it, or at least to consult with them. Tyrenius 10:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Len Tower again
[edit]The process wonkism to overturn the AfD decision of Len H. Tower Jr. has been successful, and the new discussion, along with my criticism of the process now being followed, can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard H. Tower Jr. (second nomination). Please note that previous votes/comments are not being taken into account. See you there. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 08:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Heh. I worked on the article some. LossIsNotMore 12:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bm2005.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Bm2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Abstract.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Bubbles2.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
The file File:Earth and Sky, by Lile Elam.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, was used on article Art-Net which was deleted at AfD, unlikely to have any further encyclopedic use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
