User talk:LilUzi25

Welcome to my talk page. I'll be trying to make s variety of articles in the near future. I will make them about a variety of tings from guns to Dragon Ball Z. So, stick around and see what I've got.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Rhino (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The source provided (from The New York Times) indicates that the manufacturer (Signature Products) had designed this bullet and was preparing to sell it, but other sources (The Washington Post and The LA Time) indicate that production was first delayed and then possibly cancelled altogether. No verification that this round was ever produced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Rhino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LilUzi25, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently waiting for my latest article (Time Crystals, Rick and Morty) to be reviewed and hopefully created. LilUzi25 (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC) LilUzi25[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time Crystal (Rick and Morty) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rick and Morty. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Time Crystal (Rick and Morty) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Tip Bullets (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Tip Bullets and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilUzi25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilUzi25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was disrupting Wikipedia and not following guidelines. I understand my mistakes now. I will do my best to make sure they don't happen again.LilUzi25 (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Basically per Floq, below. See User:Yunshui/How_not_to_get_unblocked#Make_non-specific_promises. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I understand that I was disrupting Wikipedia and not following guidelines. I understand my mistakes now. I will do my best to make sure they don't happen again" is basically content-free. It's something someone would say hoping it is what we want to hear. There's no indication that it's actually true.

I suggest you review your edits, and briefly describe the things you did wrong, and describe what you would do differently. Then it might be an unblock request worth reviewing. As the blocking admin, I won't decline this request, but unless you make some effort to convince us that you actually understand what went wrong, I advise against an unblock. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Black Tip Bullets concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Black Tip Bullets, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Time Crystal (Rick and Morty) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Time Crystal (Rick and Morty), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Tip Bullets

Hello, LilUzi25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Tip Bullets".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Time Crystal (Rick and Morty)

Hello, LilUzi25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Time Crystal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked so i can't work on it.

Your draft article, Draft:Exotic Ammunition

Hello, LilUzi25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exotic Ammunition".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 16:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Rhino

Hello, LilUzi25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Rhino".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 09:06, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:LilUzi25

User:LilUzi25, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LilUzi25 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LilUzi25 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LilUzi25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, It's me. I last decided to try to appeal for an unblocking 3 years ago. I understand my actions of being disruptive and not following guidelines by revealing personal information and awarding myself multiple barn-stars. I also understand that people were trying to warn me about the consequences and ignored them. But I would also like to state I was a younger at the time of the occurrence 3 years ago and have matured much, much more. So, I am once again requesting to be unblocked. Please. LilUzi25 (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No answer to below message. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd like to see that you can write encyclopedic content. I made this edit a while ago, but I saved it as an example to use; you can see that I did some work on Galactic Empire (Star Wars) to clean it up. I cited sources, added content, and fixed up the article to conform to our content policies. It took a while, but I think I made the article a bit more readable and useful. Now that you've seen an example of what kinds of edits we're looking for, can you give us a broad example of what you'd do? Answer here on your talk page. The best answer to this question, in my opinion, is to suggest an edit similar to mine. Pick an article, find something that you'd like to fix, and tell us how this block is preventing you from doing so. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]