User talk:Lightuponthenations

August 2020

Hello, I'm LauritzT. I noticed that you recently removed content from Milgram experiment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please also note these policies and guidelines: WP:UNSOURCED, WP:NPOV and WP:FRINGE. I don't know wether these apply to your edit, but I'm assuming there's a possibility since you didn't provide any citations. Please don't take it personally, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 00:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nkon21. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nick Cannon, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:18, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My source in the LA Times was explicitly stated. Your abuse of editing rights greatly diminished the quality the article, as it removed updated info necessary to clarify a controversial yet important part of Cannon’s outbursts. Lightuponthenations (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of mesivtas. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mesivta Ateres Yaakov has been accepted

Mesivta Ateres Yaakov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]