Jump to content

User talk:Lightspeed2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lightspeed2012, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Lightspeed2012! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] 
|Thanks --Lightspeed2012 16:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saltwater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC) FixedLightspeed2012 11:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

[edit]
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!

Proposed deletion of Anna Lore

[edit]

The article Anna Lore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of films set in the future

[edit]

Perhaps the Star Wars films have not been on the list because the very first film released opens with "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...". Lucas' comments on the time setting tend towards describing it in the past or in some way outside of known time... I'd certainly describe the films as "futuristic", but that doesn't necessarily mean "in the future". What do you think? Cheers Robevans123 (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I'd say they're futuristic too. The Star Wars expanded universe spans about 30,000 to 200,000 years while the films cover about 100 years. Lightspeed2012 14:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Katharina Schwabroh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everyone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

[edit]

Would you please stop reverting 76.20.25.243 and try to understand such edits [1]? Materialscientist (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I think I made a massive mistake?? Lightspeed2012 03:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In those edits like [2], yes, because 76.20.25.243 was simply removing the redundant category (and also trying to better categorize Italians and such by region) but I haven't checked for other types of edits. Materialscientist (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: I changed over 100 edits, revert them back. Lightspeed2012 03:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just please don't revert me (when reverting you) without explaining. Materialscientist (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: I meant to SAY I will NOT revert your edits. I hope we are at a good standing. Lightspeed2012 03:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The issue seems fixed. Mass reverts are always tricky, and even experienced editors like myself do them sometimes without understanding all details. Materialscientist (talk) 03:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: Thnaks Lightspeed2012 04:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox is for everyone

[edit]

While you may have been conducting a "test", the sandbox is for everyone and superloading it with irrel content in an attempt to break it, prevents those who do not have high speed connections from accessing the public space. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: I was only testing the capabilities for the specific computer I was using. BTW, According to your archives, you've been addressed before about vandalism. Lightspeed2012 18:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, lots of people cut and paste the vandal warnings i have left them back onto my page as protest that their vandalism has been removed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

[edit]

Hi Lightspeed2012,
I've decided to close the AFD you nominated as "Withdrawn" as with the greatest of respect you seem clueless to it all,
I would strongly suggest you read WP:BEFORE before renominating - You're expected to search for sources yourself before nominating any article,
The community don't take kindly to editors who nominate without following BEFORE and so if you thought todays AFD was unpleasant - You haven't see nothing yet! ,
Also you can be blocked for repeated issues like this so as I say take a read at BEFORE and WP:AFD,
Thanks and Happy Editing, –Davey2010Talk 22:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010: Thank you, I will follow the correct procedure next time. Lightspeed2012 23:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No worries - Everyone new here are a bit lost at first but once you get in to the swing of things it's a piece of pie! :),
Happy Editing! :) –Davey2010Talk 23:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Santoro and Nicole Arbour

[edit]

Hey! I noticed you said something like "it hasn't been confirmed if they got back together" while talking about Matthew Santoro and Nicole Arbour. Since when did they break up? Was there a YouTube video or a Twitter update saying that they did?

RiMiEg007 (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

[edit]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Lightspeed2012. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Lightspeed2012. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of US serial killers, table sorting

[edit]

Hi there. I just wanted to hear why you decided to revert my edit which made one of the tables use natural sorting https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/815080644 duncan.lithgow (talk) 23:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DuLithgow: Hello, I reverted it because I thought I could fix it somehow. Your edit didn't fix the sorting, all the numbers are still being sorted by one decimal place instead of two. But I couldn't fix it either and forgot to change it back. However, please note i'm a novice in editing Wikipedia; Perhaps I made a judgemental error.

Your signature

[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<span style="border:2px solid #7CB9E8;">[[User:Lightspeed2012|<font style="color:white;background:#7CB9E8;">'''Lightspeed2012'''</font>]]</span> : Lightspeed2012

to

<span style="border:2px solid #7CB9E8;">[[User:Lightspeed2012|<b style="color:white;background:#7CB9E8;">Lightspeed2012</b>]]</span> : Lightspeed2012

—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Lightspeed2012. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lightspeed2012&oldid=1146444275"