User talk:Lightning in the sky

April 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Frank Zappa; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: please see wp:CONSENSUS and wp:BRD, and of course, my proposal on the article talk page: Talk:Frank Zappa#1993 Playboy quote - DVdm (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of sources on Wikipedia

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your recent editing history at That's Incredible! shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Bosé albums

Hi, the problem with Template:Miguel Bosé is that this template is not intended to be a complete listing of all the artist's albums... the correct place for this is at Miguel Bosé#Discography, or by creating a new article at Miguel Bosé discography, following the guidelines for discography articles.

The template is supposed to be a navigation box between albums/songs that have their own article. However, because half of Bosé's albums just redirect to Bosé's article, there is no point in including them in a navbox template because they don't link to information about the album itself. And the problem with the articles you have been creating for his earlier albums is that they are not encyclopedic and fail [WP:NALBUM]]... if there is nothing to write about the album apart from a track listing, then it fails these guidelines. The albums need to have information from several reliable independent sources that talk about the album, such as writing of the songs, how the album was made, reviews of the albums by newspapers or music magazines, chart placings, etc. Richard3120 (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lightning, you've added some references to the articles on Miguel Bosé's albums, but none seem to establish notability for any of them yet. If the only sources you can find do nothing more than show that the album exists, the articles should be redirected back to Miguel Bosé. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 14:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Platón (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Platón (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platón (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 00:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Incel; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric Edwards (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eric Edwards (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ad metalla

The article Ad metalla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing significant coverage among reliable sources for this topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Right cite (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

The talk page for incel is right here: talk:incel. Here's a direct link to start a new section: [1]. There, now you have no excuses for not taking it to the talk page. Go forth, and edit-war no more. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guillermo Orea moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Guillermo Orea, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pick me (slang)

The article Pick me (slang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor sourcing, really more appropriate for Wiktionary rather than Wikipedia. (WP:NOTDICTIONARY)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

José Elías Moreno

Hi. Please stop adding unsourced and/or WP:OR content to this page. The burden is with YOU to verify the claims you are making. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"God's people"

You have twice added the quoted phrase "God's people" as a descriptor at the article Jehovah's Witnesses, but it isn't clear what you're quoting from, and the addition of the phrase is in any case superfluous, because it is obvious that the members of any given Christian denomination believe themselves to be God's people. If you believe there is a particularly strong reason for including the phrase, please discuss at the article's Talk page, indicating the source of the quoted phrase and why you think it improves the article. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mrs. Doubtfire. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You are repeatedly adding excessive and unnecessary detail to the plot, as well as your own interpretation ("immature"); there is no need for that degree of detail. Grandpallama (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrea Torre

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrea Torre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Acacacacczc (talk) 10:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Omar Germenos

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Omar Germenos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Guillermo Orea

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guillermo Orea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Omar Germenos

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Omar Germenos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Achy Breaky Heart, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aventuras del látigo negro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aventuras del látigo negro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 04:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guillermo Orea

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guillermo Orea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeff Cooper (Canadian actor)

The article Jeff Cooper (Canadian actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. A loose necktie (talk) 10:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'll keep on working on the article. Thanks for letting me know. Lightning in the sky (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeff Cooper (Canadian actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Cooper (Canadian actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Cooper (Canadian actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Condemnation to the mines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Condemnation to the mines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condemnation to the mines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aventuras del látigo negro

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aventuras del látigo negro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aventuras del látigo negro

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aventuras del látigo negro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Platón (duet) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Platón (duet), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Platón (duet)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Platón (duet), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Platón (duet)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Platón".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El papelerito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plot. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Passion (1897 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Passion (1897 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Chilean Jews, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Francisco.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Sex War moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Great Sex War. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and IMDb is not a reliable source. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 23:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Great Sex War (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NFILM. IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Great Sex War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lightning in the sky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Tequila moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 05:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on the sources but thank you for your concern. Lightning in the sky (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you have cited sources then submit for review and if the article is accepted as per Wikpedia guidelines, then it will publish accordingly in the main space and not until then.05:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Sor Tequila moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 05:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls do NOT move the page back to mainspace again for it will be deleted. You need to provide significant coverage of independent, reliable sources for verification to meet the notability guidelines. - Pls read the WP:Your first article for instructions and guidelines to create a page in Wikipedia. Cassiopeia talk 05:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Tequila moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 05:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added the sources again Lightning in the sky (talk) 05:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Tequila (Draft) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila (Draft). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 05:12, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sor Tequila (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sor Tequila and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 05:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sor Tequila (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sor Tequila and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 05:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sor Tequila has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sor Tequila. Thanks! Cassiopeia talk 05:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop placing an unsourced article in the main space - as mentioned many times independent, reliable source is needed and pls read WP:Your first article -

Pls read the comment and do not put the unsourced draft aticle back on main space as it fails the Wikipedia notability guidelines. Cassiopeia talk 05:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Tequila 2nd draft moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila 2nd draft. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 05:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lightning in the sky! Your additions to Victor Rivers have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 05:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Rivers moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Victor Rivers. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cassiopeia talk 09:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Tequila (draft 3) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sor Tequila (draft 3). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and I am moving it back to draftspace as a technical move as it should never have been moved back to mainspace without having been through the AfC process. If it is moved back to mainspace without AfC acceptance, it'll go straight to articles for deletion.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sor Tequila (draft 3) (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, I have informed many times in multiple draft of this title and in your talk page. Pls do not submit again until the notablity requirements is met. I have also provide links of what are needed a few times. Pls read WP:N, WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:COPYVIO and most of all pls read WP:Your first article. Cassiopeia talk 23:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sor Tequila (draft 3) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 23:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I took the liberty to source it and publish it. It's clearly notable. Thank you for the creation of the page.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, it was sourced enough since the page is in Spanish and it has the same sources in it which is why I republished it. Lightning in the sky (talk) 01:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Passion (1897 film)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Passion (1897 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Passion (1897 film)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Passion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Great Sex War

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Great Sex War".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

World Mythology Series moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to World Mythology Series. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 12:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lightning in the sky. Thank you for your work on Oscar Cadena. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sor Tequila (Draft)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sor Tequila (Draft), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sor Tequila

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sor Tequila, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Victor Rivers

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Rivers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sor Tequila (Draft)

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sor Tequila".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sor Tequila

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sor Tequila".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Victor Rivers

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Victor Rivers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finbhennach moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Finbhennach. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Some linked sources do not mention the subject, for other verifiability is hindered by the lack of page numbers. Please source the page appropriately following WP:V. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 14:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:World Mythologies series

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:World Mythologies series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beatrice La Plante

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beatrice La Plante, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:World Mythologies series

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "World Mythologies series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beatrice La Plante

Hello, Lightning in the sky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Beatrice La Plante".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Finbhennach

Hello, Lightning in the sky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finbhennach, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]