User talk:Lightbrite

___

Hey, Meg! As I'm looking over your theory page, I'm seeing a few areas where work could be done to improve the article. Like me, a page already existed prior to our class so you're left to clean it up and add to it, which is sometimes more work than if you had started from scratch. Ok, here's what I think...

1. The intro paragraph explaining the basic definition of Uses and Gratification could be clearer and more concise. It's a little wordy, so I think a quick edit would make the basic themes of the theory stand out.

2. Under the "Basic model" subcategory, the information provided needs to be cited properly. Again, I'm sure this was done by someone else, so I understand the difficulties associated with my suggestion.

Otherwise, I think your article is off to a great start! ___ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.80.153 (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Meg. Did you know you can get a free cupcake from Sprinkles today? Rms235 (talk) 00:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[[User:<Lightbrite>/Sandbox]] (Lightbrite (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Survey

Hi Lightbrite!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meaghan, I am Xiaosong Chen, one of your wiki review group memeber. Your ariticle is interesting. However, I find that the there is insufficient context for people unfamiliar with the subject . Besides, it is really well laid out with a lot of detail attributed points.

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & DC Meetup 26!

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really.

FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uses and gratifications theory page feedback

Meg,

I don't see any edits on the Uses and gratifications theory page that correspond to your Lightbrite user name; were you editing while not logged in or as a different user?

AlbinoFlea (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]