User talk:Lieven01

July 2009

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: it may appear promotional. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I viewed your concern, I am agree to change my username, I took that username not for promote the company. I don't know how to do, please explain to me. I accept any alternative name such as "Lieven" . Regards,

Please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. There are instructions on that page on how to file a request for a different user name. If you have difficulty with the process do not hesitate to ask for help. Shereth 15:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spammer

I am concerned that both your contribs so far are a bit off-target for Wikipedia articles and are probably just veiled spam for your company. I suggest you start with a short article about genotoxicity testing (with a redirect from cytotoxicity testing), create incoming links to it and see if others improve it. Please note: we do not justify paragraphs and we do not SHOUT, not even in section headings. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not agree with your point, the article talk about genotoxicity and cytotoxicity test because this is two things linked and I can't speack about cytotoxicity without genotoxicity. This is not a spam . I think it correspondS to wikipedia target, indeed there is a very complete description of the test but it is open to any modifications. Regards,

Shh

I have moved Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Test to User:Lieven01/sandbox. I am actually being very kind, I could well tag the article for deletion as a copyvio from http://rnasample.com/prod03.htm and block you as a spammer. Will you please:

correct the SHOUTING
re-write the piece as an article rather than a set of cookery book instructions, eg. the "Cultures" section is utterly unencyclopedic
cut down the number of references to your company's products
add links independent sources
ask me before moving the article back to the (article) namespace.

— RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, Lieven01, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy. This block is only regarding your username—it is not a judgment of either you personally or your contributions.

Names should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a "real-world" group or organization. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Cirt (talk) 06:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this was a copyvio, the content should have been blanked or deleted, but the source is not available. . As it is, the purported source gives a 404 error. Leaving this alone for others to sort. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polyclonal Antibodies Production

The article Polyclonal Antibodies Production has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Identical to large portion of content already in polyclonal antibodies

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Ciar ~ _(Talk) 08:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61047

is closed. Not seeing the username (post renaming) violation myself. Google reveals the obvious, that Lieven is a common surname. Perhaps we can (after twelve years) straighten this out. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renamer note:Shout out to renamer @Anonymous Dissident: who has not been around for a while, but you never know. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ps- this is why i always make a renamer note when I rename to avoid confusion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]