User talk:LidyaRac

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

LidyaRac (talk · contribs) has been paid by Lidya.

.

November 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

qedk (t 愛 c) 14:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LidyaRac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry I hadn't dislosed that I'm currently a Lidya employee. I'm getting paid a salary by this company every month. I have now diclosed this at the top of this page. I plan to re-edit the company's webpage as I did before. As you can see from my contribution to Lidya's page, I followed all Wikipedia's guidelines, giving references to every information present in the article. Thanks in advance, and, once again, sorry for the inconvenience

Decline reason:

Thanks for declaring, but since you only seem interested in editing about your company, there are no grounds to lift the block. Please review conflict of interest. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage (not press releases, directory listings, staff interviews, or primary sources) have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. Wikipedia has no interest in what a company wants to say about itself. If your only goal here is to edit about your company, this is the end of the line. If you want to be an individual, general contributor and edit about topics unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LidyaRac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for your reply. I do think we did have lots of significant coverage so far, and I would highly appreciate if you could revise this. For example, we have been featured on Forbes, Bloomberg, Techcrunch and CNN, just to name a few. Sorry I hadn't commented about this before, but I do think we have had substantial coverage so far, and having an article on us on Wikipedia would also enrich this platform. Thanks again.

Decline reason:

I agree with 331dot above. I appreciate the declaration, but if you only intend to edit about your company - I don't think unblocking would be appropriate. I, as well would encourage you to read our policy on conflicts of interest. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.