User talk:Lidua

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Lidua, good luck, and have fun. --Shinerunner (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Decossackization, you will be blocked from editing. The Grand Reverter 02:07, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

Blocked indefinitely as a vandalism account. Academic Challenger (talk) 02:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lidua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The claim that I have vandalized articles is slanderous. As my edit history shows, I have done no such thing. I only helped to improve the quality of the article. If this block against me is not removed, then it would be a reflection of corruption. Lidua (talk) 23:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your contributions, and they did not improve the quality of the article- in fact, they made it much worse, by adding your personal point of view to the article. Since you seem to have nothing else to add to Wikipedia, and your contributions so far made the encyclopedia worse, not better, an unblock wouldn't be appropriate. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lidua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The claim that I have added a personal point of view is a bald-faced lie unless you did not read my contributions. For each and every addition I made, I cited a source to substantiate the material. Contrary to what you've said, I did not add any of my own personal views, but included the research of scholars. Explain how this allegation of my expressing a "personal point of view" is contrary to Wikipedia's policies. Plenty of editors in the article I edited had included their personal point of view. If you do not know what has gone on, then refrain from commenting.

Decline reason:

This is clearly not your first account at Wikipedia, based on the style and content of you edits, you are a person who is long familiar with Wikipedia. Based on that, and the fact that the style of your edits and the comments you make in edit summaries substantially match those of User:Jacob Peters and his numerous other accounts, this is clearly yet another account of his.--Jayron32 01:30, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lidua (talk) 00:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]