User talk:Library777

Welcome!

Hello, Library777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to List of zombie films does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of zombie films, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 17:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of zombie films with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 17:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me try to explain what is going on. In your edit of 17:37, 20 October 2013 you added the following text to the article:

"Warning: There are a lot of movies on here with a very low budget and poor acting quality as well as many that are sexually explicit even for adults. Look up the movie details before attempting to watch."

This appears to be a statement of your opinion. Does anyone else share this opinion? If they do, it should not be too hard to find some sources that say this. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your opinion, but if a reputable authorities made such comments then you might have a basis for something. Suggest you read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and some of the essays that are linked to at the bottom of that page. Best of luck.--Toddy1 (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me try to explain to you WHY THIS DOESNT COVER YOUR DELETION. You keep adding this line "The following is a list of zombie feature films (length greater than 59 minutes) with relatively high budget or list of zombie movies which have a lot of popularity"

Which appears to be YOUR OPINION and I DO NOT see ANY references to back that up. So if you allowed that to be removed, as it is an opinion. I would not have added any line.

However, the Gay Zombie movie says "Adult film" after it. When I put "Sexually explicit" in the same block area after for example "Blood Lust Zombies" where they were having intercourse all through the movie. You removed that as well.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0499601/reviews-1 There are 1000 of these for this movie alone. Do a google.

Manipulation is when you may use some "true" info like saying the warning line was deleted, but leaving out key elements like you are allowing another "opinion" statement in the publication but not mine, and you removed the additional info that was added per the previous additions to the film list. Lets stick to these Key elements.

If you object to some of the movies on that list because they don't really satisfy the inclusion criteria, you should discuss them on the talk page or, in clear-cut cases, remove them outright (for example I just removed a 10-minute short film that clearly fell short of the "feature length" criterion). I agree that criteria such as "relatively high budget" and "have a lot of popularity" are uselessly vague, but the answer is not to add other vague, unsourced claims. Huon (talk) 18:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please read Help:Minor edit. Your contributions history shows that you are marking a lot of your edits to List of zombie films as minor edits, when they are not.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do destructible edits! Don't DELETE entry in List of zombie films. Move some of them to proper wiki-place (List of zombie other films, etc)!! --Vanquisher.UA^(talk) 20:47, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Simply add entry from List of zombie films to proper place (List of zombie other films or List of zombie short films and undead-related projects) and after then delete it! --Vanquisher.UA^(talk) 21:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with editing Wikipedia need to be addressed on-Wiki

With respect to this message you left at User talk:Toddy1, it appears that you may have included a legal threat in your message. Wikipedia has a very strict prohibition against legal threats, because of the chilling effect they have on discussion and interaction.

I know you've had some issues with edits at the list of zombie films, and I know you've gotten the short end of the stick sometimes. Please pay attention to the messages from other users and discuss matters at the talk page if you're not sure how to proceed. (In one recent case, the problem wasn't so much that you deleted a movie from the list as that you failed to list it at another page.)

Wikipedia also offers on-Wiki dispute resolution processes if you're having an issue with another editor. However, for your and our protection, if your messages leave indication that you are contemplating or pursuing off-Wiki legal action, policy requires that we block your account.

Again, please read through the WP:NLT policy, and I strongly encourage you to withdraw the comment you made on Toddy1's user talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 21:04, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Library777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I spent all day trying to contribute. I have a special needs baby and money is a concern. I looked this list up quite a while ago. It said that the movies listed were high budget, popular and the only "adult" statement after a video was a Gay Zombie Movie. My first Zombie movie was "Children Shouldnt Play With Dead Things" and back in the day, this was a pretty scary movie. I watched "Return of the Night of the Living Dead", in a theater in CT when I was 16. My Mom loved scary movies and she would watch other scary movies all the time when I was growing up. I paid money to view several of the movies listed. They were not what the list specified. I tried to modify the list so others don't get a shock. The movie "Bloodlust Zombies" stars a Porn Star and its like a Porn film. I was really disgusted. I would like you to be fair and I cannot write this on your talk because you have blocked me. I did put in two requests for unblockLibrary777 (talk) 03:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's all nice, but it does not address the reason you were blocked. Kuru (talk) 03:47, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Library777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I stated several times, I never threatened court action. I will not use the term legal action and will say "lawful action" Will that be OK? I read the WP:NLT policy and I will again restate that I DID NOT MEAN COURT ACTION. I MEANT BY LEGAL ACTION I WOULD REPORT THE INCIDENT THROUGH THE WIKIPEDIA SYSTEM. I ONLY used the term "Legal Action" to refer to reporting the incident and I have stated this many many times. I said "legal action" so you would understand I was not saying I would do something "illegal" Please reinstate my account. I have no intention of bringing a lawsuit. I don't know how to say this any clearer. I would never threaten a lawsuit against Wikipedia and I never will. Is that clear?Library777 (talk) 15:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Library777[reply]

Accept reason:

Since the only reason for the block was WP:NLT and Library77 has stated she will not be taking legal action, there is no longer a reason for the block GB fan 15:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]