User talk:Libertyactivist

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Location (talk) 06:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Libertyactivist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Floyd C. Bayne

I was not the closing administrator in the Floyd C. Bayne deletion discussion. (In fact, I'm not an administrator at all). See Stifle for that. I voted for delete or redirect, which appears to be what happened, even though the deletion summary says it was just deleted. Anyway, AFD discussions are not a vote count...it is a way for editors to voice their opinions, and then an uninvolved administrator comes along, supposedly taking the discussion into account, but ultimately does what he/she deems to be most in accord with Wikipedia policies (In this case, see wp:NOTE. I've seen overwhelming support to keeparticles, only to see them deleted at closing. If you feel strongly that this deletion was in bad faith, you could open up an RFC regarding this. I think an argument could be made (possibly using wp:Undue) that, during an election process, it is biased and NPOV to give more coverage to the incumbent (who is automatically notable due to his office) than to his opponents who, again a case could be made, achieve temporary notability, at least during the election process. I am not saying I agree with this, just that a case could be made. But I am pretty sure this has been hashed out before, since this is definitely not the first time a lesser know candidate has been deleted close to the election. Anyway, good luck moving forward. The Eskimo (talk) 15:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Greens of Virginia

You have a previous edit on this article or its discussion, so FYI: Talk:Independent Greens of Virginia#Material by editor "PonchoChet". Let's try to make the article better. -Colfer2 (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]