User talk:Liberty Pedia/Archive 1

Archive 1

Hello, Liberty Pedia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.   Introduction  5   The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page. You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

kelapstick^(bainuu) 09:06, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks kelapstick!

Liberty Pedia, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Liberty Pedia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Add Summary

Thanks for your contribution on 2013 Shahbag Protests article. But one thing keep in mind, after every editing add a summary on edit summary box. It will help other wikipedians to understand your cause of edit. Thank you.--Freemesm (talk) 16:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Biman Bangladesh Airlines

Hello Liberty Pedia. I'm sorry for reverting one of the edits you made to the article ([1]), but you added both a number of duplicated sources and repeated information. Thanks for your comprehension.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

You are Invited to Bangla Wikipedia Photography Contest 2014!

Hello Liberty Pedia, First of all take heartiest greetings from Bengali Wikipedia Community.

In order to celebrate it's 10 year Bengali Wikipedia has arranged a photography contest at Wikimedia Commons. It is scheduled to, start at 1 September 2014 00:00 (UTC) and end at 31 October 2014 00:00 (UTC). We welcome you participate there. Hoping to see you at the contest . Thanks.

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Pratyya Ghosh (talk · contribs) 15:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Biman

Can you please stop relocating the <ref name="Biman Bangladesh Airlines orders three Q400s"/> reference in the lead? It does not support the entire sentence.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I will try :) --Liberty Pedia (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Interpreting sources

Hi Liberty Pedia, I urge you to be more careful when interpreting sources in articles. I've given you a warning here. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 02:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Bangladeshi passport

Hi. I have noticed that you removed an image showing a scan of a Bangladeshi passport cover with an artist's impression of a Bangladeshi passport cover. I believe that we should not use an artist's impression or a drawing in a case where we have a real image available.--Twofortnights (talk) 16:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Not an artist's impression. -- Liberty Pedia (talk) 10:17, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

This file - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bangladeshi_Passport_Cover.jpg is a drawing and not a photo or a scan.--Twofortnights (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

What makes you say that? --Liberty Pedia (talk) 12:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Well I think it is obvious and if it isn't check out the photo and the surface structure of the actual passport which is not flat - [2] --Twofortnights (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Biman Bangladesh Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 23:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your edit to Bangladesh

The statement " He was followed, some months later, by two Bangladeshi women who also reached the top of Mount Everest. " is unsourced and not significant. Also only the first is notable, just because something has been done by a woman does not mean it has to be notable. Cite WP:RS for additions like these. Same goes for the statement Bangladesh women's national football team has also registered notable success at regional level, especially the Under-15 and Under-18 teams. Unless they won a tournament it does not seem notable. And adding un-sourced contents is disruptive editing. Respected Person (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

User:Liberty Pedia the article Bangladesh is not a feminist article. Just because something is done by a woman it does not become automatically notable. It is the person regardless of gender who does something for the first time that makes it notable. Please stop promoting feminism here. There are many men and women who went on top of Everest after Musa Ibrahim, it is not important to add them all, and Nishat Mazumder has no importance, this is nothing gender selective, if you think she should be added, then add everyone who went atop of Everest from the country. Removing the information for lack of notability, you aren't even bothering to co-operate by justifying reason for inclusion and are borderline edit warring. Respected Person (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bangladesh. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ——SN54129 12:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SN54129 13:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)