User talk:Lianne99

Welcome!

Hello, Lianne99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi Lianne :) Laura J. Lee (talk) 10:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Laura! Thank you for giving my AWESOME Wikipedia page a visit! Lianne99 (talk) 10:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Educational Template

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here.

Hello from me!

Thank you for coming along today. Don't forget to do the Sandbox tutorial in the Dashboard, and I'll see you next week! Cbderbylib (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	A copyeditor barnstar for you, for a great start! Cbderbylib (talk) 12:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically User:Lianne99/sandbox, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to echo what Marchjuly stated - book covers can only be used in the live article. The reason for this is that Wikipedia can only use the covers under fair use guidelines since they're copyrighted, which basically say that we can only use the covers in a live article to identify the article topic, and even then typically only in the infobox for the article. This unfortunately means that the image needs to be removed if you copy the article to your userspace, which is a bit frustrating but definitely something that can be worked around. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wolves of Mercy Falls - Peer Review Feedback

For the most part the article is clearly written with correct spelling and grammar, it does however have some minor grammatical errors. The lead section may be considered a bit lengthy, and can be more concise — some info could be moved into a different section. The structure is good, only issue being that the 'See also' section is empty. Some wikilinks could be added to the 'Recognition' section, as it is currently lacking. It is overall a well balanced and neutral article, well done! You also don't have any obvious copyright violations or subjective value statements, another good one there! ;)ᐜ As for competing viewpoints, a 'Reception' or 'Reviews' section could be added to get a more nuanced angle, including both positive and negative reviews, assuming they exist. Reliable sources are used throughout the article, though it may rely on the author's website a bit too much. It is well cited and verified overall, however the plot summaries need more references. For possible improvements, you could add images to the article of the book covers. WikiEmz (talk) 11:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Second Welcome

Thanks for introducing yourself at the Teahouse. Do drop by there if you ever need help with the practicalities of editing Wikipedia. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benedict-Savant series (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs a reception section on the series to show notability. Also the plots should be trimmed down more, think of 400-700 words as with film summaries.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benedict-Savant series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benedict-Savant series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lianne99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benedict-Savant series (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

Excessive unsourced content. Based on Julia Golding the series is officially Savants.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benedict-Savant series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Benedict-Savant series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 23:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benedict-Savant series concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Benedict-Savant series, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benedict-Savant series

Hello, Lianne99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benedict-Savant series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benedict-Savant series

Hello, Lianne99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benedict-Savant series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]