User talk:Liamb2011

September 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Liam Parsons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PopoDameron (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This can’t happen to me Liamb2011 (talk) 01:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remember I didn’t do anything wrong Liamb2011 (talk) 21:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Liamb2011/sandbox/Liam parsons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Liamb2011/sandbox/Liam parsons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A diehard editor (talk | edits) 03:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liam B. Parsons moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Liam B. Parsons, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 00:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No blocking Liamb2011 (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No vandalism

I’m not a vandilizor Liamb2011 (talk) 02:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamb2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Porcedural decline. Mangled duplicate.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked for only doing advertising and promotion and being a sockpuppeteer Liamb2011 (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Liamb2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason hereLiamb2011 (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not a chance. You were evading your block with a brand new sock two days after this request. I'm blocking your talk page access. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked for being a advertiser or promoter abusively using multiple accounts and making sock puppet accounts Liamb2011 (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe what constructive, non promotional, non WP:conflict of interest edits you might make. Please list all other accounts you have used. Thanks.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could make edits to some very good pages since I'm intrested in Wikipedia also the Wikipedia sock puppet accounts i used were jordansoots LiamParsons67 and more. Liamb2011 (talk) 12:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please more specifically describe what constructive edits you would make while remaining concise and clear. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could make constructive and special edits to Wikipedia pages. Liamb2011 (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #85272 has been declined. JBW (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]