User talk:LiamSAFC

Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as "The Uriah Rennie Show") are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Philippe Beaudette 18:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Uriah Rennie Show

You have recently recreated or reposted material at The Uriah Rennie Show which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. Consider this a final warning, if you continue to create articles on this subject you will be blocked without further notice. Rockpocket 09:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TURS

TURS has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In case my notice about recreating material was not clear, the warning includes creating the same article under a slightly different name or acronym. Rockpocket 03:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your creation of inappropriate pages. Please read up on our vandalism policy, Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and what Wikipedia is. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia when the block expires, but please only make pages and edits that improve Wikipedia. Rockpocket 03:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

You, or someone using your username or Internet Protocol address, vandalized the English Wikipedia page Template:Db-reason. Please stop this practice, or you may be banned from editing in Wikipedia. Anthony Appleyard 20:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Hello From LiamSAFC!

Just to address one thing, I am not an administrator on Wikipedia, and thus I do not have the power to delete articles. I do not believe that I was ever involved in anything you mentioned, though I could be mistaken. If you want to see an article re-created, pleave view WP:DRV. -- ßott e siηi ^(talk) 22:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Liam, thanks for you message. I did indeed delete a number of pages relating to the The Uriah Rennie Show. There was a number of reasons for that:

It is our policy to have a single article on a subject and then redirect other spellings or variations to that one. You had created a number of independent articles all on the same subject.
The articles made untrue claims about a living person "witnessed a tragic end to star Fiona Bruce's life". This will not be tolerated in Wikipedia whatsoever.
The articles made no valid assertion of notability for the subject (see Wikipedia:Notability), instead future speculation was provided.
No reliable sources were provided to verify the material
There was a clear conflict of interest (i.e. the sole contributor - you - is obviously involved in the programme).

If all these were met, its likely the article would remain. However, I don't expect they could be. If you would like to try and address these problems, do so in a subpage, for example User:LiamSAFC/TURS. I would be happy to look over what you have an provide advice or comment. Thanks and happy editing. Rockpocket 04:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

We can't unblock you at this time, because you haven't given us the information we need to look into your block. You yourself were not blocked; if you were prevented from editing, you must have been autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. I'm removing your unblock request because there's nothing we can do without this information. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are. If it isn't, try clearing your cache.
Try and edit the Wikipedia:Sandbox by clicking here.
Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Autoblocked?" section.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Rockpocket 18:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox header

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You may make test edits in the sandbox, but for the convenience of others, please leave the sandbox heading alone. --l E ☺N2323 22:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Uriah Rennie Show

Liam. You were warned about recreating this article yet to continued to, and so were blocked. I then explained to you why this article is not appropriate and yet, again, you recreated the article. I have therefore blocked you again. Be aware this is your very last warning. Please return after your block and continue to contribute, but realize that should violate our policies again you will be blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. Rockpocket 05:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your creation of inappropriate pages. Please read up on our vandalism policy, Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and what Wikipedia is. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia when the block expires, but please only make pages and edits that improve Wikipedia. Rockpocket 05:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JoeBastholm/LiamSAFC. While blocked from editing Wikipedia, contributors are not permitted to create sockpuppet accounts to violated policy (as you did in creating JoeBastholm to recreate the very content for which LiamSAFC was blocked for 1 week). Be aware that any further attempt to use this, or any other account, to recreate any article related to TURS will result in all your accounts being blocked permanently, on sight. You have had enough warnings, now is the time to stop or begin to heed our policies. Rockpocket 06:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

200pix

You have failed to heed my numerous warnings and created a further sockpuppet account with which to recreate your non notable article. Your contributions to Wikipedia have been nothing but disruptive therefore I am blocking you, and all of your sockpuppets, indefinately. Any further attempt to create an article will be reverted and the account blocked on site. You may appeal this block by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page and another administrator will review my actions. Rockpocket 04:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]