User talk:LiamD1
February 2007
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Celtic F.C.. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Archibald99 17:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Celtic F.C. Notable players
[edit]Please discuss any changes you wish to make on Talk:Celtic F.C. Archibald99 16:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Rangers notable players
[edit]Hi. Can I ask you not to add any more players to this list, but instead to contribute at Talk:Rangers_F.C.#Notable_players_-_criteria? Thanks. --Guinnog 17:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- That was rather rude, both the comment you made at Talk:Rangers and the fact that you went ahead and added your non-notable players. Please see WP:CIVIL, and remember to comment on the issues being raised and not on the contributor who raises them. Thanks. --Guinnog 18:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Rafael Scheidt
[edit]I see you did an article for the big man himself - yer a mad thing a chara. Shide deserves a knighthood for his service to Rangers F.C., lol!--Vintagekits 20:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Celtic players
[edit]None really spring to mind other than ones already mentioned. Have a look through Category:Celtic F.C. players. Archibald99 10:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Celtic notable players pt. 3253249
[edit]As per previous discussions - please discuss changes on the talk page and edit the article according to the consensus. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 21:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand exactly what you are asking me to respond to? And please continue discussions on relevant talk pages rather then the editor review page. WATP (talk) • (contribs) 22:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't do that again. You know very well how to use the talk page. --John 19:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nobody else agrees with you. Consensus is important. Please don't do that again. --John 19:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- "People come on wondering why players aren't there and agree that other players should be added." Who? --John 19:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keeeeaaaannnnoooo!!!!--Vintagekits 20:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- No, I mean who else (besides Liam) agrees that the likes of Keane should be added? --John 20:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keeeeaaaannnnoooo!!!!--Vintagekits 20:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- "People come on wondering why players aren't there and agree that other players should be added." Who? --John 19:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok, so you have one person who agrees with you. Why do you want to clutter the article with all these players who played a handful of games but came from an exotic country? Just to look nice, as you said, or some better reason? Why not take up Rockpocket's suggestion and make pages for some of the highly notable players of the past who lack articles? This would be far more useful than what you are doing. In fact, if you keep doing what you are doing you will be blocked. These non-notable players will not be added. --John 20:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings there but it is very important to use consensus when editing here. I saw the work you did in starting the Edvaldsson page, well done. Please respect other people's opinions and we need never fall out again. But do not add any more of these non-notable players unless you are able to establish a consensus to do so. Thanks and best wishes, --John 21:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hi again. Why have you reverted my removal of several non-notable Celtic players from the list? Please adhere to the talk page consensus. --John 22:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi yet again. Why have you again reverted against consensus? This is a cooperative project and such edits are contrary to its spirit. You are in a minority of one in wanting this huge list included in the main article. I would appreciate a response. Thanks. --John 18:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with Liam. the list should be restored. If somebody wants to remove players from the article , then they should get consensus first. PalX 13:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Cheers Palx ;).We all agreed to stick all these debatable players in a list, infact it was you who said it John.You didn't even discuss it on the talh page and players who havent even left yet have been added and its supposed to be a notable former players section.(LiamD1 (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC))
Jóhannes Eðvaldsson
[edit]An article you started, Jóhannes Eðvaldsson, has progressed into really quite a decent article. I never knew half these things about Shuggy, did you? Even the proper Icelandic spelling of his name was news to me. I've decided to award you the Football (Soccer) Star. You deserve it for all the stick you've had for trying to add Roy Keane and co to the Celtic page. Being on the wrong end of a consensus is an awful feeling sometimes; if you stick around here you will doubtless experience it again. I hope you do; there are loads of really interesting and notable Celtic greats who need articles written. Anyway, all the best, --John 06:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Do I get one for the creation I made, or do Scottish born people that consider themselves Irish disgust you? --Vintagekits 19:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
List of Celtic internationalists player
[edit]I have a feeling that I have completed the page(literally).宁雨翔 (talk) 21:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)