User talk:Liaden Graham

Speedy deletion of Bobby Light

A tag has been placed on Bobby Light requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 20:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Murdered Out

I have nominated Murdered Out, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murdered Out. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 20:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Murdered Out

If it passes AFD, then I'll add the album art for you. -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 21:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should present your arguments for keeping the article here. I'm unsure what an unofficial album even is. All that video proves is that someone somewhere made a video of a song. You still have to prove notability through reliable sources. -- Darth Mike _(Talk _{• Contribs)} 01:31, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:IceCubeDoYaThang.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IceCubeDoYaThang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THIS TAG DOES NOT APPLY, AS USER HAS PLACED PROOF OF OWNERSHIP ON IMAGE PAGE

Image copyright problem with Image:Mac-Dre-Thizz-In-Peace.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mac-Dre-Thizz-In-Peace.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. O sama K^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 21:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mac-Dre-Thizz-In-Peace.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mac-Dre-Thizz-In-Peace.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. w^L^{<speak·check>} 07:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:LilFlipMrCapone-E-StillConnected.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LilFlipMrCapone-E-StillConnected.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Peugeot Flux

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Peugeot Flux. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text you contributed to the article was copied and pasted from http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/concept_cars/peugeot_flux.html and was therefore a copyright violation. The infringing text has been removed. • Gene93k (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rice burner has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. IHG (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Rice burner constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rice burner, as well as Ricer and Rice Rocket is a term for a Japanese sports car or sport bike. Contrary to popular belief, ricers are not modified vehicles. The correct terminology in this case would be 'Tuner'.

This is not vandalism. This is correcting.

And please, stop this shit about using the fvcking sandbox for testing. I know how to edit. ForceFedR34 00:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Please note that edits to discussion and talk pages should be made with a proper and accurate signature. [1] Creating your own signature, under someone else's name (even if it doesn't exist yet), could cause validity and respectability issues with other editors. This can be done automatically by adding four tildes (~) at the end of your comment. You can test this feature out in the sandbox. Rurik (talk) 02:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Info

Adding the personal address of a celebrity to a talkpage is not appropriate. People are entitled to their privacy, and their private address should not be disclosed unless it is well known (such as the address of the white house). Please do not disclose personal information again, and if you have posted any other addresses of celebrities, please tell me so that I can request oversight of them.--Terrillja _talk 04:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eminem relapse coverart.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eminem relapse coverart.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 19:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Liaden Graham! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Liaden Graham,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]