User talk:LiaJB

October 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Satanic ritual abuse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Seduisant (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies that it read like personal commentary. My intent was to add information about the censorship. Could you please help me to phrase it in a neutral voice without excluding the information about censorship? Thank you --LiaJB (talk) 11:52, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know what constitutes appropriately neutral phrasing so that I can add the facts about censorship. Thank you. --LiaJB (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to have a reasonable discussion about the content on this page. Please contact me. Thank you. LiaJB (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the specifics of the page on talk:satanic ritual abuse but the source you tried to add, endritualabuse, is not a reliable source. In addition, since the majority of experts and scholars consider SRA a moral panic and essentially no mainstream sources take it seriously, the neutral way to deal with the subject is to reflect this fact. In other words, we do not "tell both sides" if one side is not credible. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 10:59, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LiaJB, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi LiaJB! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:06, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, LiaJB. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 01:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, LiaJB. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by hajat vrc @ 02:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

I read this book back in Grad School. I don't know if you can use it...

See http://www.amazon.com/Remembering-Satan-Tragic-Recovered-Memory/dp/0679755829 I don't know if you've used this, but it meets WP:RS in spades, I used it in the context of a graduate school history class on Witchcraft, of all things, looking at modern day analogues of witch scares. But it seemed salient given your question at The Teahouse that you were looking for good sources. --Jayron32 03:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jayron, Thank you, I will take a look at it. LiaJB (talk) 03:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]