User talk:Lgrainger199810

As we seem to be at an impasse here, I have revoked your ability to edit this page. If you wish to appeal your block further you may contact WP:BASC by email. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Lady Gaga, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to The Monster Ball Tour, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 17:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Legolas2186. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WikiPuppies! (bark) 17:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Legolas2186. WikiPuppies! (bark) 17:46, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

No one has supreme authority over their edits. Wikipedia does have guidelines for editing. You are not entitled to make an edit and then tell others to not remove it. For example, this edit. You signed your name on a page. You're not supposed to do that. Also, you've insulted a fellow editor with this. Again, you are not supposed to do that.

Abigail was here :D (Need Some Help? Click Me!) 00:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Legolas2186. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 21:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Legolas2186 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -down load ׀ talk 21:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 22:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Talk that talk tour

The article Talk that talk tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tour won't start for another year (WP:TOOSOON).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 20:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Talk that talk tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk that talk tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk that talk tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 12:32, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diamonds World Tour

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Diamonds World Tour, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Go Phightins! 20:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lgrainger199810, I've deleted this article, as well as the tour poster you uploaded. WP:Articles for deletion/Diamonds World Tour was closed as "delete" by another admin, and that decision can't be overruled simply by recreating the article. If you want to contest that deletion, first speak with the deleting admin, User talk:Yunshui. Let me know if you have any questions. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Set The World On Fire Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 Arena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alicia Keys 2013 world tour poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Alicia Keys 2013 world tour poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Promotional poster for the 2013 world tour by Alicia Keys.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Promotional poster for the 2013 world tour by Alicia Keys.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Moonshine Jungle Tour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Columbus, Newark, Washington and Wells Fargo Center

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Moonshine Jungle Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Columbus, Portland and San Juan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Unapologetic, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Dan56 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Webclient101^talk 16:39, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgrainger199810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was hacked, I did not harass anyone or say anything bad Lgrainger199810 (talk) 21:41, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:GOTHACKED. Sandstein 10:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then it shall remain blocked until such time as you have reclaimed control of it. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 23:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgrainger199810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing wikipedia for over 4 months now and i do not know why. My account was hacked but i have now managed to reclaim it. There was not inappropiate behaviour from me at all. Thank You

Decline reason:

The way I see it there are only two possibilities here:

You are lying. In which case we will not unblock you, see WP:BROTHER for more information on that.
You are telling the truth, in which case we will not unblock you either. See WP:GOTHACKED for more information on that.

Now that this situation has been made more clear to you, are you certain that your account was compromised and you had nothing to do with the objectionable edits that were made under this username? Beeblebrox (talk) 22:45, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes I am sure it was compromised. But i have now managed to recleim it

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diamonds World Tour concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diamonds World Tour, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgrainger199810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for over 6 months now and i have tried to explain that my account was compromised, i now have control over it again and i would appreciate it if i was able to edit again. Thank you Lgrainger199810 (talk) 14:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

we have no way to tell if you are now in control of this account. A compromised account can never be unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lgrainger199810 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can you not just check the IP address and match it to my user Lgrainger199810 (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not from six months ago. Kuru (talk) 21:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.