User talk:Lgallindo

Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.redeabe.org.br/bjps.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 20:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dune RPG's

Hello Mr. Gallindo!

Bem, quanto a um RPG de Dune eu nunca vi pessoalmente, mas sei que existe um livro de RPG chamado Dune: Chronicles of the Imperium. Nem sei como é o jogo, mas presumo que seja estilo "GURPS" ou "Dungeons & Dragons". Mas se você estava falando sobre jogos eletrônicos de RPG de Dune, infelizmente não há. Só há jogos de estratégia em tempo real. Você pode ver a lista dos jogos aqui.

Eu já joguei Dune (no Mega-CD e no PC), Dune II: Battle for Arrakis no Mega Drive e Dune 2000 do PlayStation. Já faz tempo, mas lembro que gostei de jogá-los, principalmente Dune II.

Falou! Agente Rolf (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neotemplarism

The article Neotemplarism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub with little useful information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. El on ka 22:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Lgallindo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Andrei Toom - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lgallindo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]