User talk:LeyteWolfer/Archive 2006

USAA

I've left a pretty unequivocal message with today's protagonist. If they make another bad edit, I will block their account. That's more desirable than locking many people out of the article altogether. Let's see if we can do this in a targetted way where possible. -Splash^talk 19:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:50, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United States Fourth Fleet

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the United States Fourth Fleet article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -- Karada 13:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Germanium

Re: [1] - LANL was used as a general, non-footnoted reference, just leave it there. The <references/> by the way is a stand-alone tag independent of the item above, you can edit them separately. (WP:FN) Femto 12:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- For my iteration, how does a non-footnoted reference differ from an external link? LeyteWolfer 01:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Samaraweera

This guy represented his country at the highest possible level. Test cricket is only open to ten countries who meet a decent standard of cricket, it is not like some country in Africa getting a wildcard for the Olympics. Clearly he meets WP:BIO.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Hope you're reading this here, but can his importance be made clear in the article?LeyteWolfer 01:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, it did say that he played Test cricket - which is implied to be international. I have expanded it, but if you see List of Test cricketers, the vast majority are in a similarly poor state. Unfortunately Sri Lanka is the only Test country from whom we do not have an active cricket wikipedian, so apart from the big names currently playing, the articles could be terrible for a while yet unless someone else decides to take a particular interest in obscure cricketers above the more successful ones. Thanks, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Understood. I'm not a cricket fan, but simply a roaming editor, so I'm no expert. I just feel that it serves very little purpose for the average person (such as myself) who visits the page. There is very little information as to who he is (even his stats are missing a great deal of information) or what the various terms mean (such as test, which had no meaning before you shared them with me). Other than those concerns, I don't feel like it /must/ be deleted. I do think you and I agree it /must/ be expanded, however. Thank you for the replies. LeyteWolfer 05:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

extra edit count information

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

GA Rating

Hey, I noticed that you rated FASA as GA class. I've changed it to Start class- to be GA class, an article has to pass WP:GAC. Thank you for taking the time to rate an article, however! --PresN 20:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the hint. --LeyteWolfer 01:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Cheers for reverting my talk page. Poor old anon IP vandals with attitude, eh? Budgiekiller 18:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Say it, brother. --LeyteWolfer 18:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]