User talk:Lexanado

Regarding your edit to Madagascar (film):

Your recent edit to Madagascar (film) (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to Mythology:

Your recent edit to Mythology (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Definition page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jerry lavoie 03:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Regarding edits you made to Fantastic Four: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jerry lavoie (talk • contribs) 03:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Jerry lavoie 03:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Madagascar (film), are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Jerry lavoie 03:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Lexa, Arkansas, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Jerry lavoie 03:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete warnings

Please do not delete user warnings. Jerry lavoie 03:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not?

Good question. Please refer to Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Editing or delting other's comments with intent to change or remove their opinion on talk pages is prohibited.

Thanks.

On a side-note. You obviously know how to edit. Why can't you find a productive manner to contribute to the project?

Jerry lavoie 03:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How many warnings do I get until I'm blocked?

Usually 4. But it is really on a case-by-case. Since Recent Changes Patrol is so active, what's the use of vandalizing articles anyway? It just gets chaged like 15 seconds later. I bet if you wanted to that you could make some really valuable changes that would stay in the encyclopedia forever. Wouldn't that be more gratifying? See User:Jerry_lavoie/Tasks for ideas on articles that need help from talented people like yourself. Alos please sign your posts on talk pages by placing 4 tildes ~~~~ after it. Jerry lavoie 03:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TELL ME WHEN IM GOING TO BE UNBLOCKED NOW OR ELSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Regarding your edit to Wikipedia:Cleanup:

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Cleanup (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lexanado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't really think what I was doing was vandalism. I was just trying to help the pages. I see this kind of stuff on the pages all the time. This is ridiculous. I actually need to be aable to edit pages. My friends and I are working on a page. i forget the name of the page, but we go over to their house eeryday and edit our page. so far we have put credible info on there that everyone can use.

Decline reason:

This block seems valid to me -- HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 04:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i would love to know when I will be unblocked asap because i realy need to do my homework and study for my final and if I fail my finals I will sue this company. Trust me I have the best lawyer in the world and i will no matter how dumb you think this reason is. I won a case when i blamed addictinggames.com for making me fail a college final, so don't laugh at my reasons.