User talk:Levylevy

Black Knight Events

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Black Knight Events, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.blackknightevents.co.uk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Knight Events

A tag has been placed on Black Knight Events, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. First Light (talk) 16:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Black Knight Events has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel are excessively editorial, attributing motives to others that are not supported by reliable sources. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 12 hours, for disruptive editing and edit warring on Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talk page to discuss controversial edits and be aware that if you persist in causing disruption, you may be permanently blocked. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=I made several edits to the liberal democrat friends of israel page, all with relevant sources. When my edits were removed - i questioned the revoking person why he was deleting my edits - to which i received no reply several times, thereby i assumed it was vandalim and followed the wikipedia guide to handling vandalism and 1)revoked Uncle Dicks changes and 2) Contacted a Wikipedia Admin (American Eagle). I can now see User Uncle Dick is in a dialogue with me on the discussion page and I would like to continue this discussion to get the content restored.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block has expired naturally

Request handled by: (talk→ BWilkins ←track)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Note. Any admin may freely unblock Levylevy without further discussion with me upon his acceptance of the above conditions, assuming the block has not, by then, expired. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 student protest in London

Regarding your addition to this article it falsely accused and named a living person of something they had not been accused of, and the citation a very poor one the Sun, did not support it either, if you add it again I will request the immediate restriction of your editing privileges. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]