User talk:Leuko/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Re: Windsor University School of Medicine edits

A few of your edits were inaccurate so I reverted them. Windsor is a WHO and IMED listed school (the statement about no accreditation is inaccurate.) The student loan scandal section was removed due to lack of relevance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGMD1 (talk • contribs) 02:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

As above, recognition by the local government and accreditation by an appropriate medical school accreditation agency are two different things. And I beg to differ, the student loan scandal is very relevant. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:24, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Your editing of the Windsor University page is inaccurate. Please cease from editing the Windsor University page with inaccurate information.

Everything is cited. Please cease with empty threats. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

The citation for the student loan scandal section is not relevant to the information contained in the section. In addition, it is the only subsection you have created for this page; you have deleted other relevant sections related to curriculum, tuition, and student life. The cited article for the student loan scandal section contains hearsay from a former student and lack of proof for the claims. Once again, your revisions are biased and inaccurate. Please refrain from editing the page in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SGMD1 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

It is cited from a WP:RS, the standard on WP. Please review WP policies. The other sections are non-encyclopedic - they are only advertising material. Please refrain from editing an article where you have an obvious conflict of interest. Thanks. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

The Curriculum, Tuition, and Student Life sections are not advertising material; these sections are found on WP articles for a plethora of educational institutions. Furthermore, Windsor University School of Medicine is accredited by the Government of Saint Kitts and Nevis, and your removal of this content and claim that the school is unaccredited is vandalism. Please refrain from editing an article for which you don't have adequate knowledge. Thanks. SGMD1 (talk) 03:17, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

3RR

Wikipedia has a hard and fast rule, called WP:3RR. It says that you can't undo the actions of another editor on the same article more than 3 times per day--more than that, and you will be blocked. I see that you've already on Windsor University School of Medicine reverted 4 times today, so technically you've broken the rule, but since you may not have been aware of it, I won't block you. However, if you revert on that article again I will. What you need to do is go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue with the other user. If you can't come to a consensus, then we have processes called dispute resolution which you can take advantage of. And just so you don't get upset, I've already given the same warning and instructions to SMGD1. Finally, note that I have declined your vandalism case against SMGD1--neither of you are vandalizing, you're simply disagreeing about article content. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Actually, I just left you a message on your talk page. I am aware of 3RR, and this type of situation has been viewed as vandalism by multiple other admins, so that's why I felt 3RR did not apply. We can continue the conversation on your talk page. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

I totally agree. LEUKO not only violates 3RR policy but violates the verifiable source of information rule on several schools pages(Windsor, CMU, Avalon, UMHS) about the lack of accreditation. This vandalizm should be stopped immidiatelly by administrators!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.38.192 (talk) 05:39, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Take it to the article talk pages, please. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizm

Your recent updates of the articles in Wikipedia clearly violate the neutral point of view therefore please stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.38.192 (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

How so? WP:NPOV doesn't state that all verified negative information should be removed at the request of school administrators/students/and others with a conflict of interest.

I have been fixing many of your inaccurate edits in the articles for several medical schools in the Caribbean over the past several days. Several of your edits regarding licensure restrictions and accreditation were inaccurate. Many of your edits included references that did not mention the school in question. For example, Windsor University School of Medicine is accredited by the Accreditation Board of Saint Kitts and Nevis. This information is readily available both from the Government of Saint Kitts and Nevis website as well as the FAIMER Directory of Organizations that Recognize/Accredit Medical Schools (DORA). Upon advising you of this, you continued to make inaccurate edits claiming the school is unaccredited, and instead made accusations about conflict of interest.

In the future, I would strongly advise you refrain from editing any articles on this topic with inaccurate information. SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 13:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

SGMD, why are you writing this here, given that Leuko hasn't edited in over a month? Bringing up such an old issue only inflames problems, not solves them. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

I've been making edits to several articles over the past few weeks and I've just now only been discovering the extent of his edits. At first I thought it was just to Windsor, but it spans over several articles. I see he hasn't edited in a while, but I thought it was important to note in case he decides to edit again. SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 14:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Brian Pho Notability Discussion

Leuko

Are you okay if I remove all the comments in the following page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brian_Pho

Sources have been verified and the article was just recently updated. Is there a need for the notability discussion comments? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leathercharm (talk • contribs) 14:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing information from St. Martinus University Faculty of Medicin

I am from a St Martinus University. I am running with an issue where correct verifiable information is being removed from the CMU (Careebean Medical University) page and correct verifiable information is being removed from our university page. I have also been told that one of the user added information with citation and all of those removed from the Wikipedia page. It appears to be a concerted effort against some of the users ( Please view the history of the Wikipedia page). The reference for the current ownership from the Curacao registry page has been removed.

I am new and therefore do not know how do we prevent the users who keep on deleting the information from our page and glorifying another scam school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharmauiuc (talk • contribs) 16:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Um....I didn't edit the Gross (units) page. Dunno why it would say I did... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.117.252.227 (talk) 22:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- --JamboQueen (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Spam-warn

Template:Spam-warn has been nominated for merging with Template:Db-spam-notice. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gparyani (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me but.

Why did you revert my edit, I only make sensible edits. 80.2.51.201 (talk) 08:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 14:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.