User talk:LetsContribute

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LetsContribute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It appears that there is a misunderstanding on the user account I have created and is blocked while trying to resolve probably another issue with Wikipedia. This is the first time I had created an account and tried to add the information regarding an Indian TV personality though I had been using Wikipedia as a learning tool for years. I had also read the guidelines to add biographies pages prior to editing the page so that I donot add information which is irrelevant or misguiding. I am extremely sorry if the content I added today was not as per wikipedia standards and would definitely like to analyse the issue and correct myself. I had also looked at the history of the edits on the page while I was editing the same as I was wondering how the TV personality with such a fan base doesn't have a page of his own. I did observe that there were recent edits by another person few days back which I feel could have been the reason for this whole confusion (though I am not sure). Infact I thought that people might not be adding the data properly and that could be the reason for reverting their changes. In any case I would request you to kindly reconsider and atleast unblock the account. If there is a problem in the data added by me I assure you that it shall be fixed. I appreciate the effort Wiki team is putting to keep the sanctity of data. Thanks

Decline reason:

After reviewing the behavioral and technical evidence available, I concur with the blocking administrator that this is not your first account. Mike V • Talk 21:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LetsContribute (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess my bad luck and a very bad timing to create the account and choose to edit a page which probably looks controversial atleast from the unblock response. Anyways thanks for quickly responding.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.