User talk:Let us be Frank

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Let us be Frank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it is important not to kneejerk to an incorrect assumption and taken on board the seriousness of the comments, here [1], and what is going on on the Brahma Kumaris page. To interpret and react it as simple disruption would be incorrect and missing the point, or value to the Wikipedia. To allow the Brahma Kumaris to control their topic by blocking other editors from editing by an endless series of complaints and reports is wrong. The examples I gave are reasons why you need someone with knowledge and experience of Brahma Kumaris and their modus operandi closely observing their edits and who is not fooled by them. Their actions are not good faith, something which you appear to be ignoring. --Let us be Frank (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mr McGeddon

Mr McGeddon,

You are being played by the Brahma Kumaris Wikipedia team who are being tutored and co-ordinated off the Wikipedia to control their topic page.

How and where can we raise this serious matter to discussion?

I am sure you are acting out of what you consider to be the best intentions and "according to policy" but what you are allowing, and the behaviour you are empowering, is not good for the Wikipedia nor its readers.

You actions are strangely one side. If you really care about the Wikipedia, you really need to look into this a little deeper.

You may be jazzed up to "fight vandalism" but this isn't vandalism. The vandalism to the principles of the Wikipedia, to the principles of knowledge and understanding, is what you are allowing and empowering the Brahma Kumari team to carry out.

How can you justify that? ––Let us be Frank (talk) 22:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]