User talk:Lestralen

Speedy deletion of Duane edward kelly

A tag has been placed on Duane edward kelly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Bencherlite ^Talk 06:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing concerns

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 05:17, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Bad guy's beaten by son goku in dragonball, dragonballz and gt, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki 02:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of section 'list of people beaten by Goku in dragonball z' in article Son Goku (Dragon Ball)

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information HalfShadow 03:26, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Son Goku (Dragon Ball)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Son Goku (Dragon Ball). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honest; it's unimportant info. John Smith doesn't need to know the names of every single guy Goku ever beat the crap out of. I believe the operative term is fancruft. HalfShadow 03:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Son Goku (Dragon Ball). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. HalfShadow 03:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dreadstar † 04:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored

Furthermore, please refrain from editing my or anyone else's userpage; it is considered vandalism. The only reason you're still capable of editing is because I suggested to the blocking admin that a permanent block may have been overkill. If necessary, I can just as easily suggest to him that his original action might have been correct. HalfShadow 04:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Winnie-the-Pooh, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Shit. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. You have a history of adding nonsense about William Robertson to various articles including: Homosexuality, Winnie-the-Pooh, GayFest, Shit, and William Gay (author). Stop immediately. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:William robertson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:William robertson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Given the recent edits from this account, it has been blocked indefinitely. Deiz talk 06:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]