User talk:Lester1231

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Lester1231. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Specifically, do you have a COI in relation to Soundtrack Magazine? DannyS712 (talk) 02:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712: Hi, DannyS712, acordding to the Mtime (A Chinese film database site as imdb) page showed the "composers" are Roc Chen and Liu Tao days ago (you can visit the webcache of the link "http://movie.mtime.com/218707/fullcredits.html" please.), so I removed the "additional composer" title. But when I just checked the Mtime page today, and found the "additinol composer" title is added after Liu Tao, so I have no problem with it. And the copying issue of the music was a headline when the film is released in China, there are over 1,230,000 people read this orignal weibo (a famouse Chinese twitter SNS site, https://weibo.com/1731585452/HfZLwbIsz ) and analysising article, and over 440,000 people viewed the orignal analysising video of Roc Chen's music and Hans Zimmer's.

You can also find the many discussion and analysising video of the music copying issue, like:

http://c.tieba.baidu.com/p/6031462037?pn=1 https://filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.cfm?threadID=134125&forumID=1&archive=0 https://www.bilibili.com/video/av43556774/ https://www.bilibili.com/video/av43275332/ https://www.bilibili.com/video/av43087442 https://www.zhihu.com/question/311595982 https://bbs.hupu.com/25544708.html

So, In order to keep the objectivity of The Wandering Earth page, I think the music copying issue must be added on. And also, the "Soundtrack Magazine" is a film music media in China, it is the orignal source, and reports the serious music copying issue in China first, but I will follow you to remove the "Soundtrack Magazine" title from the main page or just keep the media name in references. Btw, as the film The Wandering Earth is still in theator now, how can the user "Wraper11" get the ending roller screenshot (https://www.dropbox.com/s/e2titghp4suqkh6/wanderingearthendingroller.png?dl=0) of the film now? The user has any relationgship with the composer and the film producion company to avoid the negative news showed on the page? Thanks!

@DannyS712: btw, As the statement of the user "Wraper11", the public page of the Chinese sites MTIME and Douban can be only edited by the web admin, and I don't know where the "dirty words against the main composer of Wandering Earth and other Chinese composers" came from? Thanks again.

March 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Wandering Earth. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lester, thank you for commenting at the article's talk page. Some comments: Your argument above, about the sources and the "headlines" and so on, belongs at the article talk page where this issue will be decided. It does no good here on your talk page. Also: at the article talk page, stop referring to Wraper11 as the "film crew". You do not know that, and you must not accuse other editors. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN:Sorry, I have no interets to accuse a guy I don't know. And he IS the film crew, he said it from him, https://www.dropbox.com/s/qu9frk90rnlsiuv/Wraper11.jpg -- Lester1231 (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]