User talk:Lescandinave
|
You must not write information with intent to misinform, defame or deceive.
[edit]You must not write information with intent to misinform, defame or deceive.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia projects.
19th of April Movement: Difference between revisions -> Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information that is spread in a calculated way to deceive target audiences.
Uribe: Difference between revisions -> potentially libellous.
--Featured2000 (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- The Colombian press also spoke about it : http://www.semana.com/on-line/articulo/la-historia-detras-del-documento-inteligencia-acuso-uribe/67329-3
--Lescandinave (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) We could talk about your issues if you cease to threaten or accuse others. --Featured2000 (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
You should place these new references in the article about Uribe and place reliable references about the ideology of the M-19. --Featured2000 (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm helping. I just put the source - http://www.semana.com/on-line/articulo/la-historia-detras-del-documento-inteligencia-acuso-uribe/67329-3 --Featured2000 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright warning
[edit]
Your addition to Politics of Fidel Castro has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Closing your AN3 report
[edit]Thanks for your report at the edit warring noticeboard which I've now closed. Please be aware that World Net Daily is not usually considered a reliable source on Wikipedia -- see the note in my closure statement. 14:25, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Popular Force. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. A party whose ideology is simply "conservatism" does not fit far-right politics by itself, you will need to produce secondary and tertiary sources in order to produce such change. B.Lameira (talk) 21:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, Fuerza Popular is for the death penalty, against same sex marriage and against the right to abortion : http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2016/04/11/lo-que-han-dicho-fujimori-y-kuczynski-sobre-5-temas-polemicos-en-peru/.
- Several secondary sources :
- "ultraderechista populista Keiko Fujimori" (Semana, http://www.semana.com/opinion/articulo/antonio-caballero-kuczynski-gana-elecciones-en-peru/477191)
- "extrema derecha populista de Keiko" (El Mundo, http://www.elmundo.es/america/2011/04/14/noticias/1302782249.html)--Lescandinave (talk) 22:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is subjective, you can place it into right-wing populism, not far-right. --B.Lameira (talk) 22:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kim Il-Sung shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SamaranEmerald (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP!✉📝 02:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Lescandinave. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Many of the edits made on Ricardo Martinelli's biography are either inaccurate, speculative, or opinion based. I have made edits that are backed up by documentation i.e. Passports, Court Orders, Comptroller Audits, Interpol Reports, etc. Please limit edits to information supported by reputable sources. We can discuss further if need be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.22.19.239 (talk) 01:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Which part of your reversion is supported by The Washington Post? Please undo those that are not. The year of birth is 1952, Martinelli is not on the red alert list for Interpol, Panama's Comptroller Audits show that Martinelli was not involved in the alleged contract to purchase food for schools. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.22.19.239 (talk) 03:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parti_social_d%27unit%C3%A9_nationale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
May 2018
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pudeo (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lescandinave. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |