User talk:LesaLC

Your relationship to these one-edit users?

What is your exact relationship to these users? Please be completely honest, since a checkuser can reveal any deception.

Roger13Zimmerman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
68.147.133.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Pyroball (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Aaron.c.zimm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
WitKid (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

-- Brangifer (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roger13Zimmerman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Please unblock me in 1 week from Wiki. I am a new user as an editor of Wiki. I went along with Roger13Zimmerman on voting on the Colorpuncture article. After a better understanding of your policy, I realize that you don't accept that. I understand your rules better now, and will follow them in the future. My apology for any problems caused}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 21:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LesaLC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me in 1 week from Wiki. I am a new user as an editor of Wiki. I went along with Roger13Zimmerman on voting on the Colorpuncture article. After a better understanding of your policy, I realize that you don't accept that. I understand your rules better now, and will follow them in the future. My apology for any problems caused

Decline reason:

Sorry, but only one account is allowed per person. Your account was clearly created in order to help vote-stack in the AfD, and Checkuser has confirmed that the IP is shared among multiple accounts used for this purpose. Mango juice^talk 15:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.