User talk:Leonard133

November 2019

Hello, Leonard133, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Kenny139 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Toa Nidhiki05 21:22, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know a Kenny139, is there a reason you are harassing me? Leonard133 (talk) 21:28, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kenny139

I have opened an investigation into your account at SPI. Toa Nidhiki05 21:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't abuse multiple accounts

Hello, Leonard133, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Kenny139 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kenny139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonard133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet, where is the proof of this? Leonard133 (talk) 21:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were notified of a sockpuppetry investigation above; it is now located here for your review. 331dot (talk) 21:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leonard133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

so just to be clear, a wikipedia admin is telling me that I am being banned for trying to edit an article to remove a fake citation? I was called an "incel" by Nidhiki05 who got upset because I fixed an article, and then reported me for doing so. He not only did that, but when I brought up the issue of the fake citation on the articles talk page, he deleted my post. I always believed wikipedia was striving to be accurate, and as a first time user, I see that this is not the case, as I have been bullied by above user for trying to correct a mistake. I hope someone can help me with this issue, because it is not what it seems on the surface. Thank you. Leonard133 (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. Please address this and only this in your unblock request. WP:GAB can help you understand how to craft a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Correction: I did not call you an incel. I called you an imbecile. Toa Nidhiki05 22:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you called him an “imbicile” and are calling him an “imbecile.” Just to be precise. Antinoos69 (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

is there a reason you are harassing me for making correct changes to a page, or do you just hate your life that much Toa Nidhiki05?Leonard133 (talk) 02:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]