User talk:Leon12345IsCool

Welcome!

Hello, Leon12345IsCool, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:RB Battles Season 3, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jdcomix (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:RB Battles Season 3

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:RB Battles Season 3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jdcomix (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:RB Battles Season 1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:RB Battles Season 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jdcomix (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason=Your reason here Leon12345IsCool (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leon12345IsCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I wasn’t advertising or promoting anything if it was about the diocese of Nashville sports league the reason I made so many was because it has many sports league but I was never advertising the league I am (removed) if there was another reason please contact me, ThanksLeon12345IsCool (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you truly believe your content did not violate WP:PROMO then you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Come on, that was some of the most eye-rollingly promotional content I've ever seen. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock|reason=Your reason here Leon12345IsCool (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Will I ever get unblocked please guys I’m (removed) I didn’t know the rules of Wikipedia and I wasn’t try to spread propaganda I was just trying to let people know about my schools sports league [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 15:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)}} Leon12345IsCool (talk) 15:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|reason=Your reason here Leon12345IsCool (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leon12345IsCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wait was it for the RB Battles thing I wasn’t trying to spread propaganda on it I was just trying to show how cool it was also I had already seen someone else do it so I just wanted to expand on their document please unblock meLeon12345IsCool (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't tell us what edits you intend to make instead now that you know your prior edits will not be permitted. I'm also not convinced that you understand that what you were doing was promotional. Personally, I think you need to mature more as a person and Wikipedia editor before participating here. My suggestion would be that you not request to be unblocked for several years. 331dot (talk) 18:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have four simultaneous open unblock requests. Which single one unblock request do you want the next reviewing admin to review? DO NOT answer in the form of a fifth unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see WP:CHILD. Do not reveal personal information about yourself, please. --Yamla (talk) 16:35, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May you please review the fourth one about RB Battles Thanks Leon12345IsCool (talk) 16:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Leon12345IsCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Leon12345IsCool (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Leon12345IsCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Dear Wikipedia administrators, I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking."Leon12345IsCool (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2="Dear Wikipedia administrators,
I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking."[[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1="Dear Wikipedia administrators,
I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking."[[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1="Dear Wikipedia administrators,
I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking."[[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Leon12345IsCool (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You again have multiple requests open. You have one in a section header; all edits should be placed in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header window. You can avoid creating section headers entirely by clicking "edit" and not "new section" to edit this page. 331dot (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me Please

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Leon12345IsCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia administrators, I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. The reason why there were so many diocese of Nashville league pages was because they were all gonna be for one different sports and the RB Battles one wasnt to promote it but simply to extend what someone else had done. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking Leon12345IsCool (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Wikipedia administrators, I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. The reason why there were so many diocese of Nashville league pages was because they were all gonna be for one different sports and the RB Battles one wasnt to promote it but simply to extend what someone else had done. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia administrators, I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. The reason why there were so many diocese of Nashville league pages was because they were all gonna be for one different sports and the RB Battles one wasnt to promote it but simply to extend what someone else had done. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Wikipedia administrators, I sincerely apologize for any disruption my contributions may have caused. I was unaware that I was promoting content, and I have just now learned about that issue. My intention in creating the RB Battles and Diocese of Nashville League pages was solely to provide more information for the community. I never intended for it to seem like propaganda or spamming. The reason why there were so many diocese of Nashville league pages was because they were all gonna be for one different sports and the RB Battles one wasnt to promote it but simply to extend what someone else had done. I understand the importance of adhering to guidelines and am committed to improving my editing practices. I would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute positively in the future. Thank you for considering my request for unblocking [[User:Leon12345IsCool|Leon12345IsCool]] ([[User talk:Leon12345IsCool#top|talk]]) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Leon12345IsCool (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned repeatedly about multiple simultaneous open unblock requests. You continue to ignore the warnings. As WP:CIR clearly applies, I have revoked your talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 19:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.