User talk:Lenz Bayas

This is Lenz Bayas's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your draft article, Draft:Algo-Heuristic Theory

Hello, Lenz Bayas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Algo-Heuristic Theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi Lenz Bayas, I deleted your sandbox per WP:G11 (blatantly promotional). Now that I understand what you're doing, I've restored it but moved it to Draft:Work Formula, which is a better place for you to work on it. Also, in the future, if you want to communicate with me (or any other Wikipedia editor), leave a message on your Talk page or on mine; your sandbox is not the right place for it. If you have questions about Wikipedia, the WP:Teahouse is a good place to ask them. Good luck.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Language of Work Model (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Herpetogenesis was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Again, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Try Wikibooks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Language of Work Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Language of Work Model, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Work Formula (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For this to turn into an encyclopedia article, it needs to be rewritten with some actual context and without jargon such as "it creates the necessary infrastructure to ensure desired work execution" –– Wikipedia is not a textbook. As for context, to take just one example, there is an (unsupported) statement that businesses use the Work Formula to "assess business culture change needs". How do they use it? There is nothing in the description or illustration of the model that explains how it is supposed to work.

Even more importantly, there has to be sources that actually talk about the concept (sources other than Langdon himself). I have now checked Tosti & Kaufman 2007, Kaufman 2011, and Galen Davis 2011. None of those sources say anything about the "Work Formula". Petrini 1996 is simply a review of Langdon's book – and she also doesn't mention the term "Work Formula". I'm unable to access the other sources (Brethower's article is not dated correctly, by the way, it was published in 1995), but it is clear that for instance ref 8 (Galen Davis 2011) does not support the statement "The Work Formula is commonly used by business [sic]" – it doesn't mention the Work Formula! In other words, there is no actual support for the statement that this is a model that is in use. Since this was initially proposed 30 years ago, it seems that it is a term that never became generally accepted or used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Work Formula and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Work Formula, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lenz Bayas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Language of Work Model

Hello, Lenz Bayas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Language of Work Model, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Language of Work Model

Hello, Lenz Bayas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Language of Work Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Work Formula

Hello, Lenz Bayas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Work Formula, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Language of Work Model

Hello, Lenz Bayas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Language of Work Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]