User talk:Lensjockey

Welcome!

Hello, Lensjockey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Holly Von Voast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Holly Von Voast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acroterion: reply

This is a test to see if you see this, Acroterion, I have to say that actually, the reason that noone HAS started a page about me or what I do is because so many people imagine what I do is simply a stunt. Tons of news organizations and media people and stars have seen me do what I do all over New York City, and they all ( really without exception ) imagine that what I do is just stupid. Meanwhile, there is not a woman alive who would even do what I do simply as a stunt. It is far too stressful and you are ridiculed far too much for any woman to just do this for some stupid stunt reason. That's why (in fact) no woman HAS done what I have. And I've done what I do all over the city hundreds and hundreds of times... it's kindof a stunning thing to have to digest. There is a reason why you are surprised — even slightly so. Lensjockey (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome 2.0

Welcome, once again, to Wikipedia, Lensjockey/Holly Van Voast. This is a simple heads up to Wikipedia's rules and guidelines regarding the editing of articles about oneself. Cheers. -The Gnome (talk) 09:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will look at the rules and guidelines. I tried to just do things that were small. There are just so many myths and irresponsible ideas about me and what I do. Thanks! Lensjockey (talk) 21:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After rereading the entry more fully, there are really other things that are not stated correctly. The "Hooters" incident was not the "last" incident in the lawsuit, I was also involuntarily hospitalized at mental facilities (once for approximately six days) during some of these incidents, and that is a big part of the lawsuit — and would probably be interesting to readers.

My age is incorrect. I am 48. The judge's name is Rita Mella. There is also a recent article written by me that I'd like included in the entry if possible. This is the article I wrote — I was asked to write it by PolicyMic.com because they had published a story that was about the NYPD and the memo about toplessness but I informed them that they had not mentioned me.

link

I am apprehensive about making any more corrections to this story, but would like to know if these things could be done. I'd really like it if the word "flashing" could be removed also. The stories that have been written about me (for the most part) are really inflammatory and make it sound like I am just this freak who goes around like a moron, but there was a definite system and rationale that I was following explicitly. Thanks! Lensjockey (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'd like to know it the "The Co-Ed Topless Pulp Fiction Appreciation Society" can be removed. I don't know why that should be there I am not affiliated with them at all and they aren't in the entry to begin with. I am trying to do something original that has nothing to do with organized groups. I know it is hard for people to make that distinction, but it's hard enough for me to tell people that I am not a protester. I go around alone and it is much harder to do that than it is to stay in a park area with a group of women. The dynamic is completely different. Lensjockey (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The best way forward would be to provide not merely your own, personal testimony but to provide input based of third-party, reliable sources. When an article is about yourself, this does not mean that you cannot edit it; you only need to be extra careful. As to the "Co-Ed Topless Pulp Fiction Appreciation Society" link, go ahead and remove it if you think it is irrelevant! - The Gnome (talk) 22:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Gnome — I didn't really want my own personal testimony here, but I feel a duty to present a truthful account, and there really hasn't been one up at all — that's all. Are you a regular here? LensjockeyLensjockey (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holly, you can look up the information about my humble contributions here by checking out my homepage.

By the way, a lot of the stuff you recently edited-in needs substantiation from a reliable, third party. Just because you are the subject of this biographical article does not mean that you can insert information that you know is true if only you can testify it is true! Wikipedia is not about truth but about verifiability! Just so that you know, because objections are sure to be raised. Cheers. -The Gnome (talk) 15:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]