User talk:Leninist

Editing concern

The reference "Ross Kettleson, An Explanation of Triism, Providence, 2007, Kettleson"...is this a book or ???? It is quite hard to tell from the way you put it there and it does not really fulfill Wikipedia:verifiability. I will give you some other links in a second to help you as well. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 05:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Leninist! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 05:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Citing sources Neutral Point of View Describing points of view Attribution Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Etiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Resolving disputes
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Tools Village pump

Triism

One of the reasons I have been monitoring the article is that it has been deleted twice before. I am not yet convinced that it should be deleted again nor am I really convinced that the subject matter meets wikipedia criteria for verifiability. Honestly, if the only documentation that exists to verify it is a pamphlet, it really does not meet Wikipedia:Notability. Regardless, I do not plan to be the admin who deletes it if this is the case, as I am trying to give you time to learn about editing with us here in wikipedia, and perhaps time to save the article. I am confident that you are posting this in good faith, and want you to know that good faith edits are respected in our project. The references in my welcome should help you with your future work. best, Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 12:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages and user pages

Regarding user talk pages, it is preferred to not delete notices, but instead, to archive them. You will find how to do this here, under "When pages get too long." Your talk page is intended to serve as a place to discuss your contributions. It ends up being a sort of a history of the work you've done and the conflicts you've been in, or the praise you've received. It's alright to archive comments or warnings, but blanking your talk page is relatively less appropriate, as it is not actually yours but instead belongs to us all. Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:TALK. When you desire to keep the "clutter" down on your user talk page, I suggest that you create archives for these messages. I would be happy to assist you in doing just that if you ask me to. You can see a sample of archives (mine) here. As for your user page, most users seem to use it as a place to describe themselves as people and/or editing entities. Many collect links to pages they are working on and/or have been working on. You user page is more "yours," in a way, than anywhere else on wikipedia, but is not intended to serve as a personal webpage either. Once again, read here to learn more about this. -- Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 12:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Wikiland