User talk:Lemonsandlemons

July 2015

Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gerald Koocher— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 15:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I erased it from the page as the info is incorrect, and was originally created by someone who admitted to changing in maliciously on TWITTER, I can send you the proof if you wish. There are many other articles out now that prove that the statements made are untrue and so I removed it, as wikipedia isn't a one sided web platform, and shouldn't be reporting false info, based on incorrect reporting. That doesn't appear constructive to me. Would you like me to send you a multitude of articles that have been released yesterday and today so you can see what I mean?

Thanks for your help.

What else would I need to do to provide you with enough information so you can see that what was originally written is incorrect?

I've reverted. The article cites to the Washington Post and The Guardian, which are both reliable sources. The rationale you give above has no references. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]