User talk:Leliro19

Welcome!

Hello, Leliro19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 09:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Counter Vandalism

Hi Thanks for reverting vandalism on Marketing.Whenever you encounter such acts of vandalism , plz warn the user, using Template:TestTemplates,citing diffs.It helps tracking frequent vandals.regards Ikon |no-blast 11:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE warning

I do not understand why I have received a warning, all the information I provided on the St Pius website was informed, relevant and truthful. I sourced my information, and made sure grammar and syntax was correct. I also contributed by fixing up other grammatical errors that were on the page. Please explain what I have done wrong, so I can hopefully not do it again.Mega munch 11:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First identify yourself and do sign your post.I could not find warning on your page. Ikon |no-blast 11:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please sign your posts or I do not know who you are. That page in particular has received a lot of vandalism. Leliro19

Sorry, I did not know how to sign my name, thank you for teaching me. There was a warning on my page, but I deleted it because I thought it was an act of vandalism, because I cannot see what I have done wrong.Mega munch 11:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:vandalism for Wikipedia policy on vandalism. Leliro19

I Did, and it seems you misinterpreted what I meant, I meant I thought somebody had put a FAKE warning on my name, as a hoax (vandalism on my page). However, the warning interestingly enough said I was vandalising, and I read the vandalism page, and it did not say anywhere that informed, relevant and truthful information was considered vandalism. Maybe I did not read the page clearly enough. Could you please elaborate?Mega munch 12:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a fake warning, I put it there when I reverted the page. The vandalism I was referring to was the Pius X Masturbate-a-Thon section, of which I thought you were the author. Looking at the page history now, I see that it was written by an anonymous user shortly after your edits. I apologize if I accused you of vandalism when you were making changes in good faith. Leliro19

Lilero better provide him diffs. Ikon |no-blast 12:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you say to provide diffs, you mean link to the history page? How would I do that? Leliro19

Best way is to go through contribution link on userpage and select diffs copy from adress bar and present like this [1] Ikon |no-blast 13:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will do that from now on, thank you. Still learning the markup. Leliro19 13:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]