User talk:Lejzy

Welcome!

Hello Lejzy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! . Keep up the good work. Lectonar 14:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikics template

Hi Lejzy! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.

Template:User wikics

Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it (and if you actually contribute). Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 22:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India rainfall map

Hi, Lejzy. Thought id inform you that a new map has been done. Thanks for notifying me earlier --^{PlaneMad|YakYak} 15:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help for sources of European tornado information

Hi Lejzy, I'm requesting your assistance on European tornado information. We currently have two articles List of European tornadoes and tornado outbreaks and List of F5 tornadoes. The former requires additions and sources; and the latter badly needs sources for the claims of F5 tornadoes in Europe. In general, non-Western Europe is especially in need of data. There are some sources at the bottom of the European tornado list. If you can help, it would be greatly appreciated. Evolauxia 09:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much for your efforts. Although I don't doubt F5s are possible in Europe, I know of no verified cases, and do know of several meteorologists and studies that found nothing and in cases of possible F5 found a lower rating was appropriate. There is an English version of the excellent site you linked, though it appears to have less content than the Czech version does. Evolauxia 17:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

mathematical notation editing

In re scale analysis (mathematics):

Observe the difference between these two lines (in the right half of the page):

{{\partial w} \over {\partial t}}+u{\frac {\partial w}{\partial x}}+v{\frac {\partial w}{\partial y}}+w{\frac {\partial w}{\partial z}}-{\frac {u^{2}+v^{2}}{R}}=-{{\frac {1}{\varrho }}{\frac {\partial p}{\partial z}}}-g+2{\Omega u\cos \phi }+\nu ({\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial z^{2}}})

, (1)

{{\partial w} \over {\partial t}}+u{\frac {\partial w}{\partial x}}+v{\frac {\partial w}{\partial y}}+w{\frac {\partial w}{\partial z}}-{\frac {u^{2}+v^{2}}{R}}=-{{\frac {1}{\varrho }}{\frac {\partial p}{\partial z}}}-g+2{\Omega u\cos \phi }+\nu \left({\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial x^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}w}{\partial z^{2}}}\right),\qquad (1)

The parentheses surrounding the sum of three partial derivatives look different.
The comma at the end of the line looks different.
The parenthesized number (1) at the end looks different.

Those are among the changes made by my recent edits. Also, on Wikipedia, although TeX looks good when "displayed", it often looks terrible when inline.

Observe, for example, the expression $e^{\int _{0}^{1}f(x)\,dx}\,$ . It's misaligned. The e should be at the same level as the preceeding and following letters; the integral should be a superscript.

Also, note that in non-TeX notation you don't need to write 3 . 10; you can write 3 × 10 or 3 · 10.

Notice the difference between

10^-3

and

10⁻³.

The second one is legible. Similar reasons apply to my other minor edits.

Thank you for both the improvement of the article a and your explanation. My future edits will be according to this advice. --Vladimír Fuka 12:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Winter storms

There is a discussion started by User:Juliancolton at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Meteorology about a proposed/possible new WikiProject called WikiProject Winter storms. Feel free to voice your opinion on the proposal. --JForget 01:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:METEO Active members

User:Juliancolton/Active

Proposed deletion of Turbulence modeling

The article Turbulence modeling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Page has multiple issues. Information on page is already contained on pages such as computational fluid dynamics, turbulence, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, large eddy simulation, etc. Deletion of this page will prevent information creep, scattered information, and redundant efforts related to Wikipedia's coverage of turbulence and turbulence modeling. See Talk page for a vote on this issue.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I noticed you edited this page, so I thought I'd give you a heads-up. You can vote on this at the Turbulence models talk page. --Charlesreid1 (talk) 10:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]