Jump to content

User talk:Lejjona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Telephone"

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Please do not make unsourced edits, like the one you made to The Fame Monster. It turns out "Telephone" is rumoured in many blogs to be the next single, but neither the label nor Gaga has released any actual news about whether this is the case. Next time, please provide a valid source for your information; this source in general should not be a blog, as citing a blog as a source can, with a few exceptions (such as Gaga's own site), be like advertising a water filter that can make toilet water drinkable. We don't do that. Thank you and happy editing. =) CycloneGU (talk) 19:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

how about gagadaily.com ? is that a valid source?
You forgot to sign your post there - use four tildes ~ to autosign your comments. =)
GaGaDaily is a blog. It does not count as a source, and I in fact made an anonymous comment asking for the source there as well. CycloneGU (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
oh sorry i'm quite bad using wikipedia :--D but ok i understand thanksLejjona (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your understanding...and we're all here to learn, if you ever need help using Wikipedia there are many places to turn for help. I don't know everything myself, but that's the beauty of a site like Wikipedia. Happy editing...and I hope you found humour in my analogy. =D CycloneGU (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey tell me, here http://www.ladygaga.com/discography/detail.aspx?pid=2414 they say that The Fame Monster includes 'the smash single "Bad Romance" and "Telephone" '. Doesn't that mean that Telephone will be the next single or what? Lejjona (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Katy Perry discography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.