User talk:Leitz31337

I reverted your change on Phreaking. I'm not denying the validity of your edit, but it does change the information we currently have reported here without quoting a source. Many times such edits are vandalism. I would advise you to find a reliable source that reports the information you are editing into the article, then add it into the article. Generally it means surrounding the link with "< ref > < /ref >" tags (minus the spaces). If you don't know how to do this, please write to me. We here on Wikipedia strive to have accurate information, but it needs to be sourced--to prove it.Trackinfo (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Arm replantation.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Arm replantation.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Caller id spoof.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Caller id spoof.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Beckwitt

The article Daniel Beckwitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. WorldCat, Google Books, Trove, Google News, News-Gazette, Chicago Tribune show only two articles. No other newspaper sources to indicate why there should be an article about this person on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LauraHale (talk) 01:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Beckwitt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Beckwitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Beckwitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whatsup 3alarm

Sup Alarm. Hope you're doing well. Lets catch up soon. I have more luck reaching you via Twitter but its way cooler to leave you a msg on Wikipedia. Amin (Talk) 19:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]